Warmed, Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation vs Standard Carbon Dioxide in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- Conditions
- Cholecystolithiasis
- Registration Number
- NCT01667848
- Lead Sponsor
- Kepler University Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide Insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- Detailed Description
Patients undergoing warmed, humidified carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will have less postoperative pain than patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard CO2 insufflation. The study design is a double-blind, prospective, randomized study comparing patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard CO2 insufflation vs those receiving warmed, humidified CO2. Main variables included postoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scales) and analgesic requirements.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 148
- Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis
- Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis with cholecystitis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain) first postoperative day postoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scale for pain) and analgesic requirements at operation day.
The visual analog scale for pain ranged from 0-10 (0 is no pain, 10 is Maximum of pain)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Core Temperature during operation core temperature during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a rectal probe
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
2nd Surgical Department, Academic Teaching Hospital, AKH Linz
🇦🇹Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
2nd Surgical Department, Academic Teaching Hospital, AKH Linz🇦🇹Linz, Upper Austria, Austria