A study to compare the changes in the pressure in the eye, blood pressure and heart rate during insertion of tube in the trachea by direct laryngoscopy [ a tube meant for direct visualization of inside of the larynx] versus intubation through ILMA [ a less invasive device].
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/02/017674
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care PGIMS UHS Rohtak
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (I and II) and Mallampati grade 1 and 2
Exclusion Criteria
refusal to participate in the study
chronic or acute lung disease.
anticipated difficult intubation
BMI > 35 kgm-2
pregnancy
increased risk of aspiration (eg. GERD / full stomach)
•glaucoma or ocular hypertension
•external ocular infections
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rise in IOP is lesser in the ILMA group. Hence intubation via ILMA should preferred in patients of glaucoma or open eye injury patients.Timepoint: Baseline (Premedication room). <br/ ><br>After endotracheal intubation (Group DL â?? by direct laryngoscopy, Group IL- through ILMA, before removal of the device). <br/ ><br>2 min. and 5 min. after intubation. <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method se of ILMA for intubation is also associated with lesser rise in blood pressure and heart rate compared to that in intubation via laryngoscopy. Hence, it should be preferred in patients at risk of myocardial ischemia or stroke.Timepoint: Baseline <br/ ><br>Before induction <br/ ><br>Before device or endotracheal tube insertion. <br/ ><br>Just after endotracheal intubation. <br/ ><br>2 min, 5 min., 7min, 10 min, 15 min and 30 min after endotracheal tube insertion. <br/ ><br>