Effectiveness of personalized advice using a cancer risk prediction tool on modifying lifestyle habits: a randomized controlled trial
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Healthy participants
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000031313
- Lead Sponsor
- ational Cancer Center, Japan
- Brief Summary
The proportion of participants who improved their lifestyle within 6 months in the intervention group did not significantly differ from that in the control group (18.4% vs. 17.7%; P = 0.488). Among participants with low health literacy and two or fewer of five healthy habits, the proportion of participants subscribing to the lifestyle modification program was higher in the intervention group than in the control group.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 5891
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
None.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie lifestyle modification effects on cancer risk reduction in low health literacy populations?
How does personalized cancer risk prediction compare to standard lifestyle counseling in improving adherence to healthy habits?
Are there specific biomarkers associated with successful lifestyle modification in cancer prevention for individuals with limited health literacy?
What are the potential adverse events of lifestyle intervention programs in cancer risk reduction and how can they be managed?
What combination approaches or competitor tools exist for lifestyle modification in cancer prevention, particularly for those with low health literacy?