跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07407998
NCT07407998已完成不适用

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models in Assigning American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification in Preoperative Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Bursa City Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 128 人开始时间: 2024年12月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
128
试验地点
1
主要终点
Agreement Between AI-Generated and Clinician-Assigned ASA Physical Status Classification

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the performance of multiple artificial intelligence-based large language models in assigning American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classifications in adult preoperative patients. AI-generated ASA scores obtained using both prompted and unprompted clinical scenario inputs will be compared with assessments performed by experienced anesthesiologists. The agreement, accuracy, readability, and overall quality of AI outputs will be analyzed to determine the potential role of artificial intelligence in supporting preoperative risk stratification.

详细描述

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification is widely used for perioperative risk stratification but is subject to interobserver variability. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and large language models have introduced new opportunities for clinical decision support.

This prospective observational study includes adult patients undergoing routine preoperative anesthesia evaluation at Bursa City Hospital. Demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, functional capacity, laboratory findings, electrocardiography, chest imaging results, and planned surgical procedures are recorded to construct standardized clinical scenarios.

Multiple artificial intelligence models, including large language model-based systems, are provided with patient scenarios using both structured prompts and unstructured inputs. Each model assigns an ASA-PS classification and provides explanatory text. AI-generated classifications are compared with assessments performed independently by experienced anesthesiologists.

Primary outcomes include agreement and accuracy between AI-generated and clinician-assigned ASA classifications using Cohen's Kappa statistics. Secondary outcomes include readability assessment using the Ateşman Turkish Readability Index and response quality evaluation using the Global Quality Scale.

The study aims to explore whether artificial intelligence can improve standardization, objectivity, and efficiency in preoperative risk assessment while highlighting the strengths and limitations of current AI technologies in clinical anesthesia practice.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older
  • Undergoing routine preoperative anesthesia evaluation
  • Classified as ASA Physical Status I-IV
  • Availability of complete clinical data required for AI assessment

排除标准

  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Refusal to participate
  • Incomplete or missing clinical information

结局指标

主要结局

Agreement Between AI-Generated and Clinician-Assigned ASA Physical Status Classification

时间窗: Preprocedural/Perioperative

Level of agreement between artificial intelligence models and anesthesiologists in assigning ASA Physical Status classification measured using Cohen's Kappa coefficient

次要结局

  • Accuracy of AI Models in ASA Classification(Preprocedural/Perioperative)
  • Readability of AI-Generated Clinical Responses(Preprocedural/Perioperative)

研究者

发起方
Bursa City Hospital
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

eralp çevikkalp

assos proc.

Bursa City Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验