跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02475122
NCT02475122已完成不适用

Prognostic Value of Measuring DsAz by MRI in Cirrhotic Patients on Prophylactic Treatment With β Blocker (AzyMR)

University Hospital, Angers1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 71 人开始时间: 2014年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
71
试验地点
1
主要终点
Number an severity of adverse events occurring during follow up

研究概览

简要总结

Portal hypertension (PHT) that leads to esophageal varices is clinically present, at the time of diagnosis, in 60% of cirrhotic patients (Groszmann NEJM 2005). Variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication. The yearly incidence of the first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients is estimated to 4%. This risk increases to 15% when medium or large varices are initially present, (D'amico Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 1997); Therefore, for patient with medium or large varices a primary prophylaxis treatment with nonselective beta-blockers must be instituted decreasing risk of bleeding approximately by half (d'amico Hepatology 2005).

The method to evaluate the efficacy of beta blockers treatment is the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). HVPG < 12 mmHg or a decrease of HVPG of 20% after beta blocker treatment reduce dramatically the risk of bleeding (Feu F. Lancet 1995). But a good response (HVPG < 12 mmHg or reduction > 20%) to beta blockers was observed only in almost 30 % of patients. In non responder patients, the variceal bleeding incidence is estimated to 24 % at 2 years.

In this situation, alternative treatments to beta-blockers have been suggested: endoscopic ligation, which was shown to be as effective as beta blockers in primary prevention, and more recently carvedilol (Reiberger, Gut 2012).

So, HVPG monitoring may provide critical information for patients. However, because of its technical requirement and its invasivity, HVPG measurement is not feasible in clinical practice . So, there is a general consensus to continue indefinitely beta blockers treatment without control of hemodynamic efficiency (merkel J. Hepatology 2009).

Previous studies have suggested the interest of azygos blood flow measurements for evaluating hemodynamic changes in the esophageal collateral vessels of patients with portal hypertension (Bosch J. Hepatology 1985 ). More recently Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been reported to be an efficient technique to assess azygos blood flow (Gouya Radiology 2011) in cirrhotic patients. Its feasibility is obviously higher than HVPG measurement.

However, in the same way that HVPG, a large-scale implementation in clinical practice of azygos blood flow measurement by MRI requires to specify minimal absolute threshold, or relative post-therapeutic decrease, related with no variceal bleeding.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Cirrhotic patients requiring β blocker in primary prophylaxis of bleeding esophageal varices

排除标准

  • Patients under 18 year's old
  • life expectancy of less than one month
  • Patient already has a vasoactive treatment
  • patient with CHC or portal vein thrombosis
  • patient without social security or deprived of freedom
  • contraindication to MRI
  • contraindication to beta-blockers
  • mental state does not allow the signing of an informed consent

结局指标

主要结局

Number an severity of adverse events occurring during follow up

时间窗: during 2 years

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Angers
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验