Non-operative Treatment in Sweden of Proximal Humeral Fractures
- Conditions
- Proximal Humeral Fracture
- Interventions
- Device: Ultrasling ER III orthosis
- Registration Number
- NCT03786679
- Lead Sponsor
- Lars Adolfsson
- Brief Summary
Proximal humeral fractures are common especially in the elderly population. The majority of these fractures are minimally displaced and may be treated non-operatively. There is however a controversy about which fractures that need surgery and randomised trials have not been able to show a clinically important advantage in patient reported outcome measures for those operated. The trend is therefore that also displaced and comminute fractures are treated non-operatively. There is however very little scientific support for how the non-operative treatment should be designed and performed. Therefore this prospective multicenter study is aiming at investigating the benefit of a four week immobilisation orthosis as compared to early range of motion exercises for those patients not assigned for surgery one week after the trauma.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 400
- A proximal humeral fracture verified on radiology no older than 7-10 days.
- Surgically treated proximal humeral fracture
- Fracture only involving the greater tuberosity
- Previous surgery in the fractured shoulder
- Ongoing malignancy in the fractured shoulder
- Neurologic disease
- Radiating pain from the neck in the affected arm
- Associated vascular or nerve injuries
- Dementia
- Alcohol abuse
- Unwilling to participate in the trial
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Orthosis group Ultrasling ER III orthosis An orthosis with the broken arm in neutral position fixed for four weeks. After these four weeks the patient is instructed to start rehabilitation. Early rehabilitation group Ultrasling ER III orthosis The patient is instructed to start early rehabilitation about one week after the trauma.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Union of fracture Followed 12 months recording of fracture union on radiological images
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quick DASH 12 months Patient reported outcome measure of shoulder function in a 11-item PROM
Oxford shoulder score 12 months Shoulder specific patient reported outcome measure, PROM, with a maximum score of 48 points
Numerical pain reporting scale 12 months Patient reported outcome measure of pain at rest, at night and during activity in scales with 10 steps grading subjective assessment of pain
Global assessment of improvement 12 months Patient rated assessment of global improvement in a numeric scale with 7 steps
Shoulder range of motion 12 months The elevation, abduction, internal and external rotation of the injured shoulder
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Lars Adolfsson
🇸🇪Linköping, Sweden