Comparison of unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture in vaginal cuff closure during total laparoscopic hysterectomy- A randomized controlled trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 46
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare vault closure time during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using unidirectional barbed suture with bidirectional barbed suture
研究概览
简要总结
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is a well established alternative to transabdominal hysterectomy for treatment of benign uterine disease with special advantage of less pain, shorter hospitalisation, earlier return to normal activities and better cosmetic outcome. In TLH when vaginal vault is closed laparoscopically intra corporeal knot tying is done which requires experience. With development in technology , several solutions have been proposed to reduce stress on surgeons. One of these is Barb technology, which has microscopic etching which allows self anchoring without the need of knots
In this study the time taken for closure of vaginal cuff in TLH using unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture will be compared.
Hypothesis: Unidirectional barbed suture have to be locked by a loop at one end , this step is not needed for bidirectional barbed suture. Hence time taken for bidirectional barbed suture closure of vaginal cuff may be shorter
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •Patients who are scheduled to undergo total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions.
排除标准
- •Uterus >20 Weeks Acute PID.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare vault closure time during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using unidirectional barbed suture with bidirectional barbed suture
时间窗: Duration in minutes
次要结局
- To compare the post operative vaginal bleeding, infection and cuff dehiscence between the unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture in total laparoscopic hysterectomy(2 and 4 weeks after the procedure)