跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06353204
NCT06353204进行中(未招募)不适用

The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Diversion Measure Halt-intervention: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Datacentrum2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,300 人开始时间: 2024年2月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
1,300
试验地点
2
主要终点
Criminal Recidivism based on official police records

研究概览

简要总结

In the current study the effectiveness of the Dutch diversion measure Halt is investigated using a randomized controlled trial. Because of the thorough scientific substantiation of the intervention theory, it is hypothesized that receiving the Halt-intervention will lead to less recidivism in comparison to receiving no intervention.

详细描述

The Halt-intervention is a widely used Dutch diversion measure for youth (aged 12-17) who committed a minor offence. In the current study, it will be investigated whether the Halt-intervention is successful in reducing recidivism and in achieving the intervention goals. The effectiveness will be assessed using a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental condition in which participants will receive the halt intervention or to the control condition in which participants will not receive an intervention. Participants fill out three self-reported questionnaires over a time period of one year. With these questionnaires is it investigated whether the intervention is successful in achieving the different intervention goals (improving social skills, taking responsibility, correct wrongdoing or damage, improving conventional beliefs and improving support from the social network) and in achieving a reduction in recidivism. Furthermore, the adherence to children's rights in the practice of Halt is investigated. Lastly, two years after the first contact with Halt recidivism is assessed using official police and judicial records.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
12 Years 至 18 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Juveniles who have been referred to Halt after committing a minor offence that is eligible for the Halt-intervention.
  • Juveniles between the ages of 12 and 18.

排除标准

  • Participants who do not speak Dutch or who do not speak Dutch fluently.
  • Participants who have already participated in the study before.
  • Participants who are participating in the following Halt-programs: 'Hack_right', 'Respect Online' or 'Sport en Spel'.
  • Participants of whom it is suspected that their are serious concerns for their safety.

结局指标

主要结局

Criminal Recidivism based on official police records

时间窗: T3 (24 month follow up)

Assessed using official Dutch Police registration records.

Truancy based on self-report

时间窗: T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)

Assessed using the items from the Youth Delinquency Survey.

Criminal Recidivism based on self-report

时间窗: T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up)

Assessed using the items from the Youth Delinquency Survey.

Criminal Recidivism based on official judiciary records

时间窗: T3 (24 month follow up)

Assessed using official Dutch judicial records.

次要结局

  • Social skills(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Minimizing/mislabeling(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Taking responsibility for the consequences of behavior(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Experienced voluntariness(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up))
  • Access to legal assistance(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up))
  • Knowledge of not obtaining a criminal record(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up))
  • Experienced stigmatisation(T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Support from social network(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Experienced treatment(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up))
  • The right to be informed(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up))
  • Experienced re-integration(T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Conventional beliefs(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Correct wrongdoing(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up); T2 (12 month follow up))
  • Experienced legitimacy(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up))
  • Receiving adequate information(T0 (baseline); T1 (100 days follow up))

研究者

发起方
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Datacentrum
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

André van der Laan

Prof. dr.

Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Datacentrum

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验