Preliminary evaluation of the ‘Living Well on Haemodialysis’ programme

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Improvement of quality of life among people with end-stage renal disease receiving in-centre haemodialysis; Urological and Genital Diseases; Chronic kidney disease, stage 5

• Registration Number: ISRCTN10070371
• Lead Sponsor: niversity of Derby

Brief Summary

2023 Results article in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.08.008 (added 02/10/2023)

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2022-02-23
• Study Completion: 2022-04-11
• Last Update Posted: 16 October 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 13

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age over 18 years
2. Received in-centre dialysis for at least 90 days in the last 2 years
3. Able to converse in English

Exclusion Criteria

1. Not able to use the intervention because of a medical condition, active infection or malignancy
2. Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
3. Unable to take part in online data collection because of technical limitations

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Physical, mental and kidney disease-specific quality of life, measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOLSF) at baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention) and 8 weeks (4-week post intervention follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1. Psychological flexibility measured using the Acceptance and Action Scale at baseline (pre-intervention), 4 weeks (post-intervention) and 8 weeks (4-week post-intervention follow-up)<br>2. Acceptance of illness measured using the Acceptance of Illness Scale at baseline, (pre-intervention), 4 weeks (post-intervention) and 8 weeks (4-week post-intervention follow-up)<br>3. Feasibility assessed by recording recruitment and retention, plus fidelity, adherence and adverse events during the intervention and post-intervention<br>4. Acceptability assessed by collecting direct evaluative feedback using ratings scales and free-text open response formats, plus a focus group, to assess how participants experienced the intervention at post-intervention