NCT00102414
Completed
Phase 3
A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Versus Carboplatin Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Who Failed First-Line Platinum-Based Therapy
AGO Study Group0 sites356 target enrollmentSeptember 1999
ConditionsOvarian Cancer
DrugsGemcitabine
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer
- Sponsor
- AGO Study Group
- Enrollment
- 356
- Primary Endpoint
- Time to progressive disease
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 19 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to progressive disease in patients treated with gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus carboplatin monotherapy. Patients will have advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and have failed first-line platinum-containing therapy 6 months after treatment discontinuation.
Detailed Description
Carboplatin is commonly used for the treatment of ovarian cancer in first- and second-line therapy. The efficacy of gemcitabine in ovarian carcinoma was researched in various Phase 2 studies.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Histologically proven ovarian cancer with evidence of recurrence or progression
- •Failed first-line platinum containing therapy after 6 months of treatment discontinuation
- •Documented lesion as evidenced by appropriate computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, chest x-ray, or ultrasound.
- •Previous hormonal therapy or radiotherapy must be terminated at least 3 weeks before study drug administration
- •Adequate bone marrow reserve: neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 10\^9/L and platelets ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L
Exclusion Criteria
- •Receiving concomitant cytotoxic or other antineoplastic treatment. Hormone replacement therapy is allowed, as are steroid antiemetics
- •Clinical evidence of central nervous system metastases
- •Active infection
- •Cannot adequately be followed up for the duration of the study
- •A second primary malignancy (except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
- •Use of any investigational agent in the 3 weeks prior to inclusion
- •Serious concomitant systematic disorders incompatible with the study
- •Received more than one previous chemotherapy regimen or had prior gemcitabine treatment
- •Patients with tumor of borderline malignancy
- •Patients with estimated GFR ≤ 50 mL/min
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Time to progressive disease
Secondary Outcomes
- Duration of response
- Response rate
- Quality of Life
- Survival time
- Toxicity
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
Phase III Study of Two Different Schedules (Weekly and Tri-weekly) of Combination of Gemcitabine and Two Taxanes in MBCMetastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)NCT00236899Eli Lilly and Company241
Unknown
Phase 2
A Study of Locally Advanced Pancreatic CancerLocally Advanced Pancreatic CancerNCT01063192National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan73
Completed
Phase 3
Gemcitabine/Irinotecan/ZD1839 vs Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide/ZD1839 in Carcinoma of Unknown Primary SiteNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryNCT00193596SCRI Development Innovations, LLC198
Completed
Phase 3
A Phase III Randomised comparison of Gemcitabine/Carboplatin with Cisplatin/Etoposide in Small Cell Lung Cancerung (small cell) cancerCancerLung (small cell)ISRCTN39679215CRI CSG and London Lung Cancer Group (UK)241
Completed
Phase 2
Efficacy Trial of Gemcitabine Containing Regimens As Preoperative Chemotherapy in Non Small Cell Lung CancerCarcinoma, Non Small Cell LungNCT00191256Eli Lilly and Company77