Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT06514859
NCT06514859RecruitingNot Applicable

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Inguinal Hernia

Sohag University1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: June 10, 2024Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Recurrence in management of inguinal hernia
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaArms & InterventionsOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approaches for inguinal hernia surgery and provide evidence-based guidance to the selection of the most appropriate operative technique.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Male patient > 18 years of age
  • •Primary groin hernias requiring surgical intervention that are eligible for both open and laparoscopic repair.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Emergency procedures .
  • •ASA score >
  • •Irreducible inguinoscrotal hernia .
  • •Local or systemic infection .
  • •Other abdominal hernias being operated at the same time or planned operated during Follow up.
  • •Previous surgery which has impaired the sensation in the groin area .
  • •BMI > 40 kg/m
  • •Known disease which Impairs central or peripheral nerve function .
  • •Concurrent malignant Disease .
  • •Chronic pain which requires daily medication . • Mental disorder which requires daily medication .

Arms & Interventions

Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia

Active Comparator

Intervention: Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia (Procedure)

Open repair of inguinal hernia

Active Comparator

Intervention: Open repair of inguinal hernia (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Recurrence in management of inguinal hernia

Time Frame: 6 months after operation

Rate of recurrence in both open and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Abdelaziz Mohamed Abdelaziz

Resident at General, Oncology, Laparoscopic Surgery Department , Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University

Sohag University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Phase 3
LEVEL Trial: Correction of Inguinal Hernia, Endoscopic Versus LichtensteinInguinal Hernia
NCT00788554Erasmus Medical Center660
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Needlescopic Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in PediatricsCongenital Inguinal Hernia
NCT06660550Sohag University20
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly PatientsRelapseUrinary RetentionPainPostoperative Complications
NCT06417346Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş160
Completed
Phase 3
Prospective Randomised Study Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Patients With Rectal CancerRECTAL CANCER
NCT00782457Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca200
Completed
Not Applicable
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With MeshHernia, Ventral
NCT00240188US Department of Veterans Affairs110