跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06666738
NCT06666738尚未招募不适用

Evidence Based QUality Improvement for Prescribing Stewardship in ICU: Can a Structured Antimicrobial Review be Implemented in LMIC ICUs?

University of Oxford0 个研究点目标入组 6,300 人开始时间: 2024年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
6,300
主要终点
Fidelity

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the implementation of a process to review antimicrobial prescriptions for adult patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

The main question it aims to answer is: can a structured antimicrobial review can be implemented in ICUs?

Implementation will be supported by the use of local protocols, audit and feedback, and education. It will be evaluated by daily data collection of clinical processes and interviews with local champions.

Resources to conduct the study are provided by the Wellcome Flagship Innovations award. ("Collaboration for Research, Implementation and Training in Critical Care in Asia and Africa", reference 224048/Z/21/Z).

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All adult ICUs within CCAA-affiliated Care Quality Registries
  • ICUs must appoint a named Champion to facilitate implementation
  • All antimicrobial prescriptions for adult patients within the ICUs described above

排除标准

  • ICU's which demonstrate adoption and reach of 80% or greater (median over 2 months) of a pre-existing structured antimicrobial review

结局指标

主要结局

Fidelity

时间窗: Evaluated over calendar month periods during months 4-6 (i.e. the three months immediately following implementation)

The proportion of prescriptions reviewed as intended (reviewed within 48hours with documentation of all 4 review components: indication, route, duration, stop date). Reported as a proportion of the number of possible reviews.

Reach

时间窗: Evaluated over calendar month periods during months 4-6 (i.e. the three months immediately following implementation)

Proportion of eligible patients who receive a review

Adoption

时间窗: Evaluated over the calendar month period of month 7

Proportion of prescriptions reviewed as intended once implementation support has been withdrawn

次要结局

  • Antimicrobial Density (AD)(Evaluated over calendar month periods during months 1-7 of the study.)
  • Duration of Therapy(Evaluated over calendar month periods during months 1-7 of the study)
  • Antimicrobial Redundancy Rate(Evaluated over calendar month periods during months 1-7 of the study)
  • Antimicrobial resistance rate(Evaluated over calendar month periods during months 1-7 of the study)
  • Antimicrobial prescribing rate(Evaluated over calendar month periods during months 1-7 of the study)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

Evidence Based QUality Improvement for Prescribing... | 临床试验