Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Two 10% Urea Creams in Patients With Diabetic Foot Syndrome
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot
- Interventions
- Other: Participants were given the 10% urea cream purchased in pharmacy or supermarket as appropriate after randomisation and their foot skin quality was assessed by validated questionnaire.
- Registration Number
- NCT05588258
- Lead Sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Brief Summary
Randomised, double-blind, cost-effectiveness clinical trial of two 10% urea creams purchased in pharmacies and supermarkets in patients with diabetic foot syndrome.
- Detailed Description
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two 10% urea creams in patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome.
The methodology was a prospective, longitudinal, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, longitudinal clinical trial that evaluated the skin quality of 20 participating feet belonging to 10 patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome after the application of two 10% urea creams purchased in pharmacies and supermarkets.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Patients >18 years with Diabetic Foot Syndrome
- Deep or superficial sensory neurological involvement diagnosed by Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament and Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork
- ABI (Ankle Brachial Index) in normal range
- Metabolic Syndrome
- No cognitive impairment
- Patients who agreed to be included in the study by signing a written consent
- Patients with hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the components of both creams.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Pharmacy cream 10% urea Participants were given the 10% urea cream purchased in pharmacy or supermarket as appropriate after randomisation and their foot skin quality was assessed by validated questionnaire. Use of pharmacy cream in prevention Supermarket cream 10% urea Participants were given the 10% urea cream purchased in pharmacy or supermarket as appropriate after randomisation and their foot skin quality was assessed by validated questionnaire. Use of supermarket cream in prevention
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cost analysis of two 10% urea creams purchased in pharmacies and supermarkets. 5 months The cost analysis will be carried out considering the price per ml of 10% urea cream used by the participants during their participation in the study.
Assessment of the skin quality of participants' feet before and after the cream application intervention using a validated questionnaire. 5 months The assessment of skin quality was carried out using the "Questionnaire for assessment of injury risk and skin quality in patients with diabetic foot syndrome", validated intra-observer and inter-observer by this research group. The minimum score assigned in this questionnaire is 0 points and the maximum score is 12, with higher scores correlating with higher risk of injury and poorer skin quality of the feet.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
José Luis Lázaro Martínez
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain