MedPath

Host Modulatory Effects of β-glucan on Localized Aggressive Periodontitis

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Localized Aggressive Periodontitis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02402296
Lead Sponsor
Al-Azhar University
Brief Summary

combining the non-surgical therapy with a well-tolerated substance that can stimulate protective immune responses like B-glucan, might effectively mount resolution pathways contributing to resolving of the chronic lesion observed in aggressive forms of periodontal disease.

Detailed Description

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of β-glucan supplementation to non-surgical periodontal therapy in localized aggressive periodontitis (LAP) patients.

Method: 30 subjects were randomly and equally assigned to receive scaling and root planing; either with placebo pills (Group I) or β-glucan (100 mg/once a day) (Group II), for 40 days. Subjects were clinically monitored on day 0 and day 91. Gingival samples were harvested from hopeless teeth sites to be investigated histologically and immunohistochemically using matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and 9 antibodies form each patient; at the same time intervals.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Except for periodontitis, patients were systemically healthy as evaluated by modified Cornell medical index.
  • No more than two teeth other than first molars and incisors, with probing depth (PD) ≥ 5mm, bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) ≥ 5mm.
  • Rapid rate of attachment loss and bone destruction.
  • A radiographic examination revealing an evidence of moderate to severe vertical bone loss around permanent incisors and first molar teeth.
  • Every patient should have at least 20 teeth excluding third (3rd) molars, and at least an extraction-indicated tooth for a dento-periodontal affection.
  • Familial aggregation.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous subgingival scaling and root planing, allergy to β-glucan, smoking, former smoking, pregnancy, need of antibiotic coverage for routine dental therapy, antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months and allergy to chlorhexidine.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group I (control group)PlaceboWas assigned for patients who had scaling and root planing and empty capsules filled with carbohydrates (placebo) for 40 days.
Group II (test group)β-1,3/1,6-D-glucanIncluded those patients who received a systemic β-1,3/1,6-D-glucan (100 mg capsule) once/ day for 40 days after scaling and root planing.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

It is the distance from the base of the pocket till the cemento-enamel junction using Williams graduated probe

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9)Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

Their immuno-expression was assessed in the gingival samples harvested from the gingiva adjacent to hopeless teeth (planned to be extracted for dento-periodontal causes)

Pocket Depth (PD)Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

It is the distance from the base of the pocket till the gingival margin using Williams graduated probe

Gingival Index (GI)Day 0 and day 91 post therapy

Using the values of the gingival index according to (Loe \& Silness, 1963); 0-no bleeding on probing

1. delayed bleeding on probing

2. immediate bleeding on probing

3. spontaneous bleeding

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath