Host Modulatory Effects of β-glucan on Localized Aggressive Periodontitis
- Conditions
- Localized Aggressive Periodontitis
- Interventions
- Other: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT02402296
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
combining the non-surgical therapy with a well-tolerated substance that can stimulate protective immune responses like B-glucan, might effectively mount resolution pathways contributing to resolving of the chronic lesion observed in aggressive forms of periodontal disease.
- Detailed Description
Aim: To investigate the efficacy of β-glucan supplementation to non-surgical periodontal therapy in localized aggressive periodontitis (LAP) patients.
Method: 30 subjects were randomly and equally assigned to receive scaling and root planing; either with placebo pills (Group I) or β-glucan (100 mg/once a day) (Group II), for 40 days. Subjects were clinically monitored on day 0 and day 91. Gingival samples were harvested from hopeless teeth sites to be investigated histologically and immunohistochemically using matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and 9 antibodies form each patient; at the same time intervals.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Except for periodontitis, patients were systemically healthy as evaluated by modified Cornell medical index.
- No more than two teeth other than first molars and incisors, with probing depth (PD) ≥ 5mm, bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) ≥ 5mm.
- Rapid rate of attachment loss and bone destruction.
- A radiographic examination revealing an evidence of moderate to severe vertical bone loss around permanent incisors and first molar teeth.
- Every patient should have at least 20 teeth excluding third (3rd) molars, and at least an extraction-indicated tooth for a dento-periodontal affection.
- Familial aggregation.
- Previous subgingival scaling and root planing, allergy to β-glucan, smoking, former smoking, pregnancy, need of antibiotic coverage for routine dental therapy, antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months and allergy to chlorhexidine.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group I (control group) Placebo Was assigned for patients who had scaling and root planing and empty capsules filled with carbohydrates (placebo) for 40 days. Group II (test group) β-1,3/1,6-D-glucan Included those patients who received a systemic β-1,3/1,6-D-glucan (100 mg capsule) once/ day for 40 days after scaling and root planing.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) Day 0 and day 91 post therapy It is the distance from the base of the pocket till the cemento-enamel junction using Williams graduated probe
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Matrix Metallo-proteinase (MMP-1&9) Day 0 and day 91 post therapy Their immuno-expression was assessed in the gingival samples harvested from the gingiva adjacent to hopeless teeth (planned to be extracted for dento-periodontal causes)
Pocket Depth (PD) Day 0 and day 91 post therapy It is the distance from the base of the pocket till the gingival margin using Williams graduated probe
Gingival Index (GI) Day 0 and day 91 post therapy Using the values of the gingival index according to (Loe \& Silness, 1963); 0-no bleeding on probing
1. delayed bleeding on probing
2. immediate bleeding on probing
3. spontaneous bleeding