ISRCTN14899342Completed未知
Comparison of the mOm incubator with a standard incubator for the maintenance of thermal stability in infants in infants (=6 kg)
mOm Incubators limited0 sites43 target enrollmentStarted: April 16, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 43
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Current inclusion criteria as of 29/11/2021:
- •1. Parent/legal guardian is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- •2. Parent/legal guardian is aged 16 years or above
- •3. Participant considered clinically stable from a cardiorespiratory point of view
- •4. Participant requires incubator care but do not require additional humidification
- •5. Participant requires incubator care for at least 48 hours.
- •6. Participant is at least 30 weeks gestational age.
- •7. Participant weighs 6 kg or less
- •Previous inclusion criteria:
- •1. Parent/legal guardian is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- •2. Parent/legal guardian is aged 16 years or above
- •3. Participant considered clinically stable from a cardiorespiratory point of view
- •4. Participant requires incubator care but do not require additional humidification
- •5. Participant requires incubator care for at least 48 hours.
- •6. Participant is at least 30 weeks gestational age.
- •7. Participant is less than 8 kg in weight
Exclusion Criteria
- •1. Parent/legal guardian with learning disabilities or mental illness and are considered unable to give informed consent
- •2. Parent/legal guardian is a prisoner or young offender
- •3. Parent/legal guardian is considered to have a particularly dependent relationship with the investigator(s)
- •4. Parent/legal guardian is deemed to belong to a vulnerable group
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
Comparative Evaluation Of The Micro-Osteoperforations And Piezocision On The Rate Of Canine movement.CTRI/2024/03/064039Dr Gaikwad Darshan
Completed
Not Applicable
THE COMPARISON OF IMPLANT STABILITY BETWEEN TWO IMPLANT SURFACES USING RESONANCE FREQUENCY ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT: PILOT STUDY.bone-implant interfacerandomized controlled trialimplant surfaceosseointegrationsurface topographyDoes the super-hydrophilicity surface render the SLActive Straumann® ITI implants a promising solution for rapid bone anchorage comparing to the standard plus SLA-surface?Can the healing phase of iTCTR20170614002THE 90th ANNIVERSARY OF CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY FUND (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund) (Acquis30
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE AND MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE AS PULPOTOMY AGENTS IN PERMANENT MOLARS : A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIACTRI/2024/05/068056Dr. Aakash Kumar
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparing methods to fill primary teeth using digital radiographyCTRI/2024/04/065848Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry
Completed
Not Applicable
A comparison of the ability of the Inditherm® mattress and the forced hot air blower to prevent hypothermiaSurgery: PancreatectomySurgeryOther complications of surgical and medical care, not elsewhere classifiedISRCTN38219428Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health60