Procedural Outcomes of Percutaneous PDA Closure: Comparative Study Between Different Devices.
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT04303793
- Lead Sponsor
- Assiut University
- Brief Summary
To compare safety, efficacy and procedural outcome of percutaneous PDA closure using different approaches for better characterization of device selection criteria.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- all patients who are candidate for transcatheter PDA closure
- Patients with PDA dependent pulmonary circulation.
- Patients with small sized PDA which is silent by auscultation
- Patients with large sized PDA which is unsuitable for Trans-catheter closure
- Patients with PDA and severe irreversible pulmonary hypertension (Eisenmenger's syndrome) (7).
- Patients with active infection or active infective endarteritis.
- Patients refusing the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Procedural safety one month studying the occurrence of catheter related complications including
1. Occurrence of vascular access hematoma(Yes/No )
2. Occurrence of contrast induced nephropathy (Yes/No)
3. PDA closure Device embolization (Yes/No)
4. Cardiac tamponade (Yes/No)Procedural efficacy one month timing of complete closure of the PDA with no residual shunts
1. Residual left to right shunt (Yes/No)
2. Degree of the residual shunt (Trace, Mild , Moderate, severe)
3. Timing of closure of the shunt( immediately postprocedural, 24 hours post procedural , 1 month post procedural )Procedural outcomes one month comparison of echocardiography data that will be done pre catheter closure, one day post procedure and one month later ( left ventricular and atrial dimensions-left ventricular ejection fraction-pulmonary artery systolic pressure- degree of tricuspid regurge)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method