Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05734300
NCT05734300RecruitingNot Applicable

Organ SPARring Surgery vs. Standard Resection for Early Stage COLon Cancer in Elderly Frail Patients

Zealand University Hospital3 sites in 1 country48 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
48
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Change in patient-reported postoperative recovery - Quality of Recovery 15

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Mortality following elective colorectal cancer surgery range between 2.5-6% and increase for the elderly and frail patient regardless of T-stage. Around 80% of the patients who present with a colon cancer and is in a condition where surgery is possible will be offered resection of the tumor. A part of the colon is always removed together with the lymph nodes in order to ensure that cancer cells are not left behind. The risk of lymph node metastasis is dependent on several histopathological characteristics of the tumor. The overall risk of lymph node metastases is less than 20 % in patients with early colon cancer. This indicates that the majority of patients with early colon cancer have no benefit of additional resection besides local tumor excision. The alternative to resecting a larger part of the bowel is to make more focused surgery only resecting a small part of the bowel part through a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques. This new organ sparing approach is called Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS). The investigators aimed to examinate the hypothesis that organ preserving approach (CELS) provides superior quality of recovery in elderly frail patients with small colon cancers when compared with standard surgery in RCT.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
65 Years to — (Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Male and Female participants providing written informed consent aged 75 years and older
  • •PS score ≥1 and /or ASA score ≥3
  • •Macroscopically or pathological colonic adenocarcinoma
  • •Clinical TNM classification T1/T2 N0 M0
  • •Eligible and suitable for CELS resection according to MDT
  • •Tumor must be located in colon, and not involving the ileac valve or taking up more than 50% of the lumen in an air-distended bowel wall

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Unable to give informed consent
  • •Histological high-risk features in biopsy material from tumor (mucin, signet cells, de- differentiation)
  • •Suspected other malignancy than adenocarcinoma (e.g. neuroendocrine tumors)
  • •Preoperative chemo/radiotherapy
  • •Creation of stoma perioperative
  • •Non-Danish speakers

Arms & Interventions

CELS

Experimental

The Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS) is a hybrid procedure that enables large local excisions of the colon without segmental resection while under general anaesthesia. In our study, CELS refers only to endoscopic assisted laparoscopic resection.

Intervention: Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS) (Procedure)

Standard Surgery

Active Comparator

Standard surgical resection of colonic cancer following standard oncologic principles while under general anaesthesia.

Intervention: Standard resection (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in patient-reported postoperative recovery - Quality of Recovery 15

Time Frame: Change in QoR-15 will be assessed repeatedly at baseline, 4-8 hours postoperatively (4-8H), postoperative day (POD) 1, POD 2, POD 3, POD 7, POD 10-14 and POD 30

Validated to measure recovery after surgery and general anesthesia, and additionally validated for use in Danish language and culture. The scale is arbitrary and ranges from 0 to 150. Higher scores means better recovery. The established minimum clinically important difference in QoR-15 is 8.0, and the SD of QoR- 15 scores after major surgery is in the order of 16.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in exercise capacity and physical condition(Changes will be assessed repeatedly at baseline, Postoperative day 1, Postoperative day 2, Postoperative day 3 or at the time of hospital discharge, whatever comes first. Postoperative day 10-14 and 30 days postoperatively.)
  • Clavien-Dindo classification(Within 90 days postoperative.)
  • Long-term oncological outcomes: Overall survival(During 3-year follow-up periode)
  • Intraoperative complications(Intraoperative)
  • Changes in The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire- EORTC CRC.(Changes will be assessed repeatedly at basline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year follow-up)
  • Blood loss(Intraoperative)
  • Rate of complete resection margin(Postoperative day 14)
  • Length of hospital stay(Within 90 days postoperative.)
  • Changes in The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire - EORTC C30.(Changes will be assessed repeatedly at basline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year follow-up)
  • Duration of surgery(Intraoperative)
  • Frailty questionnaire Geriatric 8 (G8)(Basline)
  • Assessment of histopathological risk factors(Postoperative day 14)
  • Long-term oncological outcomes: Disease-free survival(During 3-year follow-up periode)
  • The Comprehensive Complication Index(Within 90 days postoperative.)
  • 90-day mortality(Within 90 days postoperative.)
  • Rate of secondary standard resection(Within 90 days postoperative.)
  • Conversion rate(Intraoperative)
  • Long-term oncological outcomes: Recurrence(During 3-year follow-up periode)
  • Hospital readmissions(Within 90 days postoperative.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials