Effects of Grade III Traction-mobilization in End-range Joint Position in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Interventions
- Other: Manual caudal traction mobilization in end range positionOther: Manual caudal traction mobilization in resting positionOther: Selftreatment
- Registration Number
- NCT02469025
- Lead Sponsor
- Universidad de Zaragoza
- Brief Summary
Lower limb osteoarthritis is a major health problem in the westernized countries. The current gold standard treatment is joint replacement. However clinical guidelines recommend physical therapy as first option for these patients. Manual therapy has reported good reports in function, range of motion and pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The main aim of this study is to test the effects of a manual therapy protocol based on manual traction mobilization of the hip joint in an end range position and compare them with the effects achieve with the same protocol based on manual traction mobilization of the hip joint in a resting position. The investigators will use the caudal traction mobilization described by Kaltenborn. The study will test the effects of both treatments in passive range of motion, function and pain after three weeks of treatment, three weeks after finalizing the treatment and six weeks after.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- Hip osteoarthritis diagnosis
- Diminished range of motion
- Sign the informed consent
- Contraindications to Manual Therapy.
- Sensitivity impairments in low back, pelvis, knee or foot regions.
- Being involved in other physical therapy treatments
- To change medication use during the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description End range position mobilization group Manual caudal traction mobilization in end range position This group receive six manual therapy interventions based on manual traction mobilization in an end range position of the hip joint. In addition the physical therapist teach the patients six exercises to do at home between manual mobilization sessions. Resting position mobilization group Selftreatment This group receive six manual therapy interventions based on manual traction mobilization in a resting position of the hip joint. In addition the physical therapist teach the patients six exercises to do at home between manual mobilization sessions. Resting position mobilization group Manual caudal traction mobilization in resting position This group receive six manual therapy interventions based on manual traction mobilization in a resting position of the hip joint. In addition the physical therapist teach the patients six exercises to do at home between manual mobilization sessions. End range position mobilization group Selftreatment This group receive six manual therapy interventions based on manual traction mobilization in an end range position of the hip joint. In addition the physical therapist teach the patients six exercises to do at home between manual mobilization sessions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from Baseline in Passive Hip Range of Motion after intervention, at 3 weeks post-intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes from Baseline in Functional Tests (TUG, fast-paced walk test, stair climb test, 30sec. chair stand test), after intervention, at 3 weeks post-intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks Change from Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analog Scale after intervention, at 3 weeks post-intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks Change from Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scale after intervention and at 6 weeks post intervention 3 weeks, 9 weeks
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Unidad de Investigación en Fisioterapia. Universidad de Zaragoza
🇪🇸Zaragoza, Spain