跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02798822
NCT02798822已完成不适用

Dental Arches Response to Haas-type RME Anchored to Deciduous vs Permanent Molars in Children With Unilateral Posterior Crossbite

University of Genova4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 88 人开始时间: 2013年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
88
试验地点
4
主要终点
Crossbite correction (binary outcome yes/no: clinical evaluation in vivo and on digital dental casts)

研究概览

简要总结

Posterior crossbite is a common clinical condition often associated with transverse maxillary deficiency and functional mandibular shift. This frequent malocclusion is not self-correcting and can lead to the development of craniofacial asymmetries and mandibular dysfunction.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate maxillary and mandibular arch widths' response to RME when it is anchored to the upper second deciduous molars or to the upper first permanent molars and to create a decision-making protocol for RME therapy in mixed-dentition patients.

详细描述

The effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the maxillary complex have been highly investigated,4 reporting a maximum maxillary intermolar and intercanine width increase of 6.7 mm and 5.3 mm,5 respectively, when RME is banded on upper first permanent molars.

Literature also reported cases of periodontal and endodontic damage on RME anchoring teeth; therefore, some authors have suggested banding RME on primary teeth and reporting also different mean intermolar (3.6-4.1 mm) and intercanine width increases (5-5.9 mm).

Few studies have investigated the changes in molar dental tipping and inclinations (on average from 3° up to 16.7°) following RME but comprised difficult (ie, barium sulfate solution) and more invasive examinations such as computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Few articles concerning the indirect effects on mandibular arch following RME reported a low but statistically significant increase of lower intermolar (0.66-0.97 mm) and intercanine width (0.9 mm). Since no studies in the literature have analyzed the differences in permanent vs primary molars as anchoring teeth for RME, the decision to band the permanent deciduous molars did not follow a clinical protocol, but an individual decision was made for each patient based on clinician experience.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
8 Years 至 10 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients in mixed dentition
  • Unilateral posterior crossbite at least of the first permanent molar
  • Upper deciduous second molars available as RME anchoring teeth

排除标准

  • Primary exclusion criteria
  • Previous orthodontic treatment
  • Hypodontia in any quadrant excluding third molars
  • Inadequate oral hygiene
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders
  • Craniofacial abnormalities
  • Secondary exclusion criteria
  • Lack of records
  • Need for lingual arch
  • Lack of consensus
  • Need for other orthodontic treatment during rapid maxillary expansion

结局指标

主要结局

Crossbite correction (binary outcome yes/no: clinical evaluation in vivo and on digital dental casts)

时间窗: 5 months

次要结局

  • Upper and lower incisor angulation and rotation (changes in mm and degrees of dental angulation and rotation measured on digital dental casts and Dental digital X-ray)(10 months)
  • Molar angulation (degrees of transverse expansion measured on digital dental casts)(10 months)
  • Crossbite correction stability (binary outcome yes/no: clinical evaluation in vivo and measured on digital dental casts)(10 months)
  • Canine angulation (degrees of transverse expansion measured on digital dental casts)(10 months)
  • Molar expansion (mm of transverse expansion measured on digital dental casts)(10 months)
  • Canine Expansion (mm of transverse expansion measured on digital dental casts)(10 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

ALESSANDRO UGOLINI

DDS MS PHD Researcher

University of Genova

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验