Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06919900
NCT06919900RecruitingNot Applicable

Motor Learning of Fall Resistant Skills Through Slip and Trip Exposure in Multiple Sclerosis

Georgia State University1 site in 1 country64 target enrollmentStarted: April 6, 2026Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
64
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Perturbation Outcome (Fall or Non-Fall) on the Treadmill or Overground

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this interventional study is to examine the overall motor learning capacity from exposure to repeated perturbations among ambulatory people with multiple sclerosis (MS). This project will advance our understanding of learning new motor skills from exposure to external perturbations. If it is proven that people with MS can learn motor skills from perturbation training, the findings from this study will pave a theoretical foundation for applying perturbation training as a promising fall prevention intervention for people with MS.

Detailed Description

Falls present a significant health risk for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Perturbation training has emerged as a promising strategy to prevent falls. This type of training, which is based on sensorimotor adaptation and motor learning, capitalizes on the central nervous system's (CNS) ability to develop new motor skills. With repeated exposure to large-scale slip or trip perturbations, participants can quickly learn how to better respond to falls. The primary benefits of this training include improved dynamic stability control, both proactively and reactively, by adjusting the body's center of mass (COM) relative to its base of support (BOS).

Sixty-four individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A (training) and Group B (control). Both groups will first participate in an acquisition session. Group A will undergo a training procedure blending slips, trips, and unperturbed walking on a treadmill. In contrast, Group B will walk on the treadmill for the same duration without any perturbations. Immediately following the acquisition session, both groups will experience an unexpected slip and trip while walking over ground (with the order of the slip and trip randomized). Three and six months later, both groups will complete two retention sessions. Each retention session will involve experiencing a treadmill slip and trip (treadmill reslip and retrip) and an overground slip and trip (overground reslip and retrip), with the order randomized. Responses to these perturbations will be measured using the outcomes of fall or non-fall, dynamic stability, leg muscle reaction times, and recovery step length. Additionally, real-life prospective falls and near falls will be monitored for both groups over the six months following the acquisition session.

This project will advance our understanding of learning new motor skills from exposure to external perturbations. If it is proven that people with MS can learn motor skills from perturbation training, the findings from this study will pave a theoretical foundation for applying perturbation training as a promising fall prevention intervention for people with MS.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Both the participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to each participant's group assignment. However, the researchers who conduct the training will not be blinded.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
45 Years to 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Clinically confirmed multiple sclerosis
  • •At least 45 years old
  • •Able to walk independently at least 25 feet
  • •Able to stand independently for at least 30 seconds
  • •Patient Determined Disability Steps score between 0 and 4
  • •Free from pregnancy
  • •Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 23 or higher

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Previous experience with perturbation training
  • •T-score from the dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of less than -2.5
  • •Coexisting psychiatric disorders or other neurological conditions, severe medical illness, or cardiovascular diseases
  • •Participants have had a relapse in the past 8 weeks

Arms & Interventions

Training Group

Experimental

During the acquisition session, this group will undergo perturbation training on the treadmill while wearing a safety harness. Then, they will experience an unexpected slip and trip while wearing a safety harness and walking overground. During the 3-month and 6-month retention sessions, they will experience a slip and trip during treadmill walking and a slip and trip during overground walking.

Intervention: Perturbation Training (Behavioral)

Control Group

Active Comparator

During the acquisition session, this group will walk on the treadmill without perturbations for the same amount of time as the training group. Then, they will experience an unexpected slip and trip while wearing a safety harness and walking overground. During the 3-month and 6-month retention sessions, they will experience a slip and trip during treadmill walking and a slip and trip during overground walking.

Intervention: Treadmill Walking (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Perturbation Outcome (Fall or Non-Fall) on the Treadmill or Overground

Time Frame: Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.

A loadcell will be connected to the safety harness (above the participant's head) and will measure the force exerted on the safety harness during each perturbation trial. Perturbation outcomes will be classified as falls if the peak loadcell force exceeds 30% of the body weight. Otherwise, perturbation outcomes will be classified as non-falls.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Dynamic Gait Stability as defined by the Feasible Stability Region (FSR) Theory(Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.)
  • Leg Muscle Reaction Time(Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.)
  • Prospective Real-Life Falls and Near Falls(6 month period after the acquisition session)
  • Recovery Step Length(Baseline (acquisition session), 3-month retention session, 6-month retention session.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Feng Yang, PhD

Professor

Georgia State University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials