CTRI/2018/03/012500已完成未知
Early minimally invasive surgery versus extended percutaneous drainage in step-up approach in infected pancreatic necrosis: a randomized controlled trial. - EARMIDS
Rajesh Gupta0 个研究点目标入组 36 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 36
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis who are being managed with percutaneous catheter drainage for three to seven days and who deteriorated or did not show significant improvement on PCD treatment alone.
排除标准
- •1. Traumatic pancreatitis
- •2. Previous intervention for pancreatitis like surgical/ endoscopic necrosectomy
- •3. Significant improvement after PCD insertion. (Improvement was characterized by tolerance to oral feeds, falling WBC counts, resolution of organ failure, defervescence)
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Minimally invasive versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement: retrospective multicentre-studyI35.0Aortic (valve) stenosisDRKS00025211Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus5,000
招募中
3 期
A phase III study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer (JCOG1409, MONET trial)clinical stage I/II/III (excluding T4) thoracic esophageal cancerJPRN-UMIN000017628Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG)300
招募中
不适用
Lung cAncer Robotic Comparative StudyLung CancerNCT06038227Intuitive Surgical600
已完成
不适用
Microsurgical versus minimal invasive approach (Metrix instrument), for lumbar disc herniation surgery: a randomized controlled trial on clinical outcome.M51.1Lumbar and other intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathyDRKS00000092Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie Direktor Prof. Dr. J. Schramm226
已完成
不适用
Clinical evaluation comparing minimally invasive and standard skin incisions in cementless total hip arthroplasty using the Bimetric Hip system with the 38mm M2A cup. Clinical evaluation of incision size in total hip replacementISRCTN17429244Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health (UK)