跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05097521
NCT05097521已完成不适用

Complementary and Integrative Health for Pain in the VA: A National Demonstration Project (NIH-VA-DOD Joint Initiative)

VA Office of Research and Development4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 3,603 人开始时间: 2021年3月17日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
3,603
试验地点
4
主要终点
Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale

研究概览

简要总结

The APPROACH Study (Assessing Pain, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complementary and Integrative Health) assesses the effects of use of practitioner-delivered CIH therapies alone compared to the combination of self-care and practitioner-delivered CIH therapies among Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The APPROACH study is predominately conducting a secondary analysis of patient-reported data being collected by the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) Office of Patient Centered Care and Cultural Transformation among Veterans receiving care at one of 18 VA medical centers. Those 18 facilities received funding to expand availability of CIH therapies as part of the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act of 2016. That patient-reported data is being supplemented with VA electronic health record data and data on the 18 medical centers' business practices (nudges, the instrumental variable). Practitioner-delivered therapies under study include chiropractic care, acupuncture, and therapeutic massage; self-care therapies include Tai Chi/Qigong, yoga, and meditation. The primary outcomes are improvement in pain severity and pain interference, assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), six months after initiating CIH therapies compared to baseline. Patients will enter treatment groups based on the CIH therapies they use, as randomizing patients to specific therapies would require withholding therapies routinely offered at VA. The investigators will address selection bias and confounding by using sites' variations in business practices and other encouragements (nudges) to receiving different CIH therapies as a surrogate for direct randomization using instrumental variables econometric methods.

详细描述

Design: The investigators are employing a quasi-experimental encouragement study design in which subjects are able to choose their own CIH therapies, but some are offered extra encouragements (nudges) to choose specific CIH therapies. Instead of being randomized to a CIH therapy, individuals will enter one of three study groups - Veterans Using Practitioner Delivered CIH Therapies Only, Veterans Using Self-Care CIH Therapies Only, or Veterans Using a Combination of Practitioner-Delivered and Self-Care CIH Therapies (Dual-Care) - based on what CIH therapies they used six months after they initiate any CIH therapy. Although accrual to study group is not random, some sites have strong business practices/nudges that lead to considerable variation in which CIH therapies patients use. The variation induced by these business practices/nudges provides a quasi-experimental natural experiment that can be assessed through an instrumental variables analytic approach. The purpose of using business practices as an instrument for accruing patients to treatment groups, similar to the use of randomization, is to reduce potential selection and confounding bias. The six-month treatment window will allow for patients to initiate one type of CIH therapy and add additional CIH therapies based on business practices/nudges at their site within the evaluation period. The CIH therapies that patients receive will be as they are delivered by the 18 VHA Whole Health flagship study sites and community care practices.

The APPROACH study was initially envisioned to examine primary and secondary outcomes for the above-named three study groups. Due to the study's pragmatic design and sampling approach, the sample size of the Veterans Using Self-Care CIH Therapies Only group did not meet the minimum threshold necessary to detect between-group differences of interest. It was therefore determined that study revisions would be necessary.

Sites: The study sites are the VA's 18 Whole Health Flagship sites: VA Boston Health Care System, VA New Jersey Health Care System, Erie VAMC, Beckley VAMC, W. G. (Bill) Hefner VAMC, Atlanta VAMC, Tampa VAMC, Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Aleda E. Lutz VAMC, Tomah VAMC, St. Louis VA Health Care System, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Salt Lake City VAMC, VA Portland Health Care System, Palo Alto VAMC, Tucson VAMC, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System).

Secondary Data from the VA Office of Patient Centered Care and Cultural Transformation's Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey: The APPROACH study is predominately conducting a secondary analysis of patient-reported data being collected by VA OPCC&CT's four timepoint survey (baseline and months 1, 3, 6). Almost all of the outcomes listed below are from that survey.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 89 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • History of (chronic) musculoskeletal-related pain conditions recorded in the EHR in the year prior to the index visit, and self-report pain present every day or nearly every day for 3 months from the CIH index visit using an eligibility screener
  • Aged 18-89 on index CIH visit date

排除标准

  • Diagnoses of serious mental illness in the year prior to initiating CIH
  • History of spinal cord injury
  • Hospitalization 30 days prior to initiating CIH
  • Recorded CIH use in the EHR in the 6 months prior to the index CIH visit and reported CIH use in the 8 weeks prior to index CIH visit

研究组 & 干预措施

Veterans using practitioner-delivered CIH therapies only

Veterans using practitioner-delivered CIH therapies only

干预措施: Practitioner-delivered CIH therapies (Other)

Veterans using a combination of practitioner-delivered and self-care CIH therapies (dual-care)

Veterans using a combination of practitioner-delivered and self-care CIH therapies (dual-care)

干预措施: Combination of practitioner-delivered and self-care CIH therapies (Other)

Veterans using self-care CIH therapies only

Veterans using self-care (yoga, meditation, Tai Chi, Qi Gong) CIH therapies only

干预措施: Self-care CIH therapies (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale

时间窗: Change from baseline to 6 months

Measure of pain-related functional interference. Scores range 0-10; higher score is worse.

Brief Pain Inventory Severity Scale

时间窗: Change from baseline to 6 months

Measure of pain intensity. Scores range 0-10; higher score is worse.

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Scale

时间窗: Change from baseline to 6 months

Measure of pain severity. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale

时间窗: Change from baseline to 6 months

Measure of pain-related functional interference. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating greater pain-related functional interference.

次要结局

  • PROMIS10 assessment of general quality of life(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for improvement in mental health(6 months)
  • PROMIS10 global assessment of mental health(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • PROMIS10 assessment of fatigue(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for improvement in pain(baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for improvement in fatigue(6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for improvement in physical health(6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for improvement in overall well-being(6 months)
  • PROMIS10 global assessment of physical health(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Improvement in Pain(6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Improvement in Mental Health(6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Improvement in Fatigue(6 months)
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Improvement in Overall Well-being(6 months)
  • PROMIS10 Global Assessment of Physical Health(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • PROMIS10 Global Assessment of Mental Health(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • Life Engagement Test (LET)(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4)(Change from baseline to 6 months)
  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2)(Change from baseline to 6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Assessing Pain, Patient Reported Outcomes and... | 临床试验