comparison of two techniques , lung ultrasound and listening to air flow by stethoscope, to confirm flow of air in both lungs at two volumes of lung ventilation in cardiac surgical patients
- Conditions
- Diseases of the circulatory system,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/05/013586
- Brief Summary
This study is being started in cardiac surgical patients in SGPGI LUCKNOW where two techniques are being compared ie lung ultrasound and auscultation for confirmation of bilateral air entry in cardiac surgical patients at two different tidal volumes , for rapidity, sensitivity and specificity of each technique.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Undergoing elective cardiac surgical procedure under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation Informed written consent.
Modified Mallampati class 3 or 4 Morbid obesity patients with critical preoperative state (ventilated, cardiogenic shock, inotropic support, intra-aortic balloon pump.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Accuracy of each method, sensitivity and specificity time taken for each technique
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method faster and feasible technique before induction of anaesthesia anaesthetist 2 and 3 auscultate and do ultrasound lung then immediately after intubation and confirmation of adequate capnograph by intubating anaesthetist 1, no. 2 & 3 auscultate and do USG at 7ml/kg or 10 ml/kg TV (randomised) all the 3 results (before induction and at 2 TV)are marked on a paper and time taken to auscultate and USG at both TV is also noted by OT technician
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
OT 1- Cardiovascular and thoracic surgery OT, SGPGIMS MAIN OT COMPLEX
🇮🇳Lucknow, UTTAR PRADESH, India
OT 1- Cardiovascular and thoracic surgery OT, SGPGIMS MAIN OT COMPLEX🇮🇳Lucknow, UTTAR PRADESH, IndiaDr Prabhat TewariPrincipal investigator9794393344ptewari123@yahoo.co.in