NCT03494582已完成不适用
Trans Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy for the Management of Uterine Prolapse
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 53
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
研究概览
简要总结
This study will compare the vaginal versus the abdominal approach for the management of uterine prolapse
详细描述
this study compares The unilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy with prolene sutures versus the abdominal sacral hysteropexy using Mersilene suture for the management of uterine prolapse
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 40 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Uterine Prolapse
排除标准
- •Previous prolapse surgery Hereditary Connective tissue disorders
结局指标
主要结局
Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
时间窗: 3 month
compare Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system between groups
次要结局
- Perioperative data(1 day)
- operative details(1 day)
研究者
Hamdy Ahmed Saaid
Fellow of OBS/GYN
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
Unknown
不适用
Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous HysteropexyPelvic Organ ProlapseNCT04850365Ain Shams University70
尚未招募
不适用
SAVE U -trial: Sacrospinous fixation versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of a uterine prolapse stage ≥ 2: a multi-center randomised controlled trial.NL-OMON26877Isala Klinieken208
Unknown
不适用
Effects of Hysteroscopy and Transvaginal Surgery on Reproductive Prognosis in Patients With Post Cesarean Scar DefectPost Cesarean Scar DefectHysteroscopyNCT04096677First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University200
招募中
不适用
Sacrospinous fixation versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine prolapse stage >= 2: a multi-center randomised controlled trialprolapseuterine descent10046828NL-OMON35140Isala Klinieken198
进行中（未招募）
不适用
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal ProlapseUterine ProlapseNCT05063331University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center300