跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07642466
NCT07642466招募中不适用

Patient Reported Outcomes for Bladder Management Strategies in Young Adults With Spina Bifida

Blayne Welk1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2025年1月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
300
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Spina bifida (SB) is a birth defect that affects the spine, often causing paralysis in the legs and problems with bladder and bowel control. Managing these bladder issues is important, but different methods, like using a catheter or surgery, can impact a person's quality of life. This study looks at how different bladder management methods affect the quality of life for young people with SB. Researchers will ask people with SB to complete a survey about how they manage their bladder and how it impacts their daily lives. The main goal is to find out if certain bladder management methods are associated with a better quality of life. This information could help doctors make better treatment decisions and counsel young people living with SB.

详细描述

Spina bifida is a congenital defect of the spine where some of the spinal cord and its covering (meninges) are exposed through a gap in the lower back or sacrum; this often results in paralysis of the lower limbs. The majority of spina bifida (SB) patients also have pelvic floor dysfunction (bladder, bowel, prolapse, sexual function) because of neurologic damage to this portion of the spinal nerves, and this increases the risk of their long-term morbidity. These problems place a substantial burden on patients' physical health and quality of life (QoL). Serious urological complications, such as urosepsis, skin breakdown, and renal failure, can occur in this patient population due to bladder dysfunction. Approximately 50% of young adults with SB have renal dysfunction, 50% have urinary incontinence, and they are nine times more likely to present with urinary tract infections. The "gold standard" bladder management strategy when a person with SB is unable to void spontaneously is to perform clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Alternatives to CIC include spontaneous voiding (if possible), incontinence products, an indwelling catheter (IDC), or reconstructive surgery (to create a urinary diversion or to enable CIC). However, IDC and surgery have increased risks of specific complications, including the risk of bladder cancer, urethral damage, urinary infections, and surgical morbidity. People with SB usually discuss bladder management options with their urologist, however they may prioritize a variety of factors around bladder management that directly affect their QOL, and these may not be as apparent to urologists. This is further complicated when patients reach adolescence and young adulthood; at this age they transition from pediatric to adult care providers, all while transitioning in other areas of their life (such as increasing responsibility, cognitive growth, and a wish for more independence). These factors may all impact thoughts about bladder management. Few studies have addressed QoL in relation to different bladder/bowel management methods in this SB age group, and most have not considered things like health literacy and cognitive function.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
13 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Diagnosis of SB
  • Age ≥13 years of age
  • Able to effectively communicate in English or Spanish
  • Willing to provide informed consent for participation and answer a set of questionnaires

排除标准

  • Reconstructive surgery or urinary diversion in the last 3 months
  • Hospital admission in the last 1 month
  • Inconsistent or newly changed (within the last month) method of bladder management

研究组 & 干预措施

Voiding/incontinence

SB patients who manage their bladder with voiding/incontinence

CIC

SB patients who manage their bladder with clean intermittent catheters

Diversion

SB patients who manage their urination with a surgical bladder diversion

Indwelling catheter

SB patients who manage their bladder with an indwelling catheter

研究者

发起方
Blayne Welk
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Blayne Welk

Principle Investigator

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验