COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY BLOCKBUSTER VERSUS INTUBATING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR INTUBATION
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Unknown
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 80
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Time taken for successful tracheal intubation by Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway
Study Overview
Brief Summary
A newer device similar to ILMA was recently designed in 2012 with the name Blockbuster Laryngeal mask airway by Professor Ming Tian .
The efficacy and success of the new airway device have not been studied much and comparison with other devices of the airway management is limited. Due to its ease of use, speed of implantation, and success rate, the aim is to compare Blockbuster LMA and ILMA methods in patients undergoing elective surgery during general anaesthesia to evaluate whether it is an acceptable alternative for airway management.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Computer generated randomization
- Masking
- Participant and Investigator Blinded
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA 1 & 2) patients.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with cardiovascular diseases
- •Risk of aspiration pneumonitis e.g, pregnant patients, history of gastro-oesophageal reflux
- •Obesity (Body Mass Index > 30kg/metre square.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Time taken for successful tracheal intubation by Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway
Time Frame: Time taken after achieving adequate ventilation by both airway devices to time taken to achieve successful tracheal intubation by both Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway.
Secondary Outcomes
- 1.Time taken for successful insertion of airway device(2.Number of attempts for successful insertion)