Decisionmaking for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB)
- Conditions
- Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
- Interventions
- Other: Adaptive Conjoint Analysis
- Registration Number
- NCT01721304
- Lead Sponsor
- Indiana University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if using a computer survey about preferences for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is useful and if it will improve patient satisfaction with clinical care and decision making. This study is a two-part study. The first pilot tests the computerized tool to ensure it is understood by patients, then the second part is a randomized study (computerized tool versus usual care) to see if improvements are made in satisfaction and if there are reductions in decision regret.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to determine if using a computer survey about preferences for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is useful and if it will improve patient satisfaction with clinical care and decision making. This study was designed to develop and test the use of ACA as part of routine clinical care for women diagnosed with AUB. After pilot testing, the ACA survey is administered in this study where patients are assigned to receive the ACA or to usual care.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 380
- Have received a diagnosis of dysfunctional or abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) that is recommended for treatment
- Have not yet selected or initiated treatment for current AUB diagnosis
- Be at least 18 years of age.
- Be possible candidates for either medical or surgical therapy
- Able to provide informed consent for treatment options for oneself
- Are currently being treated for cancer
- Any cancer diagnosis within the past 2 years (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
- AUB due to serious pelvic pathology, medications, pregnancy or systemic disease that limits their range of treatment options
- Are not recommended for surgical intervention
- Are not recommended for medical intervention
- Are under 18 years of age
- Have not received a diagnosis of AUB
- Are currently being treated for AUB
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Computerized survey to elicit preferences
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Differences in decision regret between treatment groups 6 weeks Decision regret is measured by the Decision Regret Scale
Differences in patient-reported satisfaction between treatment groups 6 weeks Satisfaction with care as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Scale (FACT-TS-PS)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Indiana University
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Southern Pines Women's Health Center
🇺🇸Southern Pines, North Carolina, United States