MedPath

Autism and Disruptive Behavior Trial

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Child Behavior Problem
ASD
Interventions
Behavioral: Social Worker
Behavioral: Social work + ABHN
Behavioral: Autism Behavioral Health Navigation (ABHN)
Behavioral: Social work + ABHN + CAP
Registration Number
NCT04204226
Lead Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Brief Summary

Investigators seek to transform the delivery of health care to children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and behavioral health problems (and their families) by developing an innovative tiered set of interventions. Investigators aim to demonstrate that for children with ASD and disruptive behavior a family navigation-based intervention (autism behavioral health navigation; ABHN) will be feasible and more acceptable to families than brief social work consultation. For children with persistent disruptive behavior despite the social work or ABHN intervention Investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of adding consultation with an interprofessional team of ASD experts.

Detailed Description

Context: It is often challenging to help families of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) manage disruptive behaviors. Family navigation and interprofessional care are promising care strategies that could be applied to care for these children.

Objectives: Investigators aim to demonstrate that for children with ASD and disruptive behavior a family navigation-based intervention (autism behavioral health navigation; ABHN) will be feasible and more acceptable to families than brief social work consultation. For persistent disruptive behavior despite the social work or ABHN intervention we will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of adding consultation with an interprofessional team of ASD experts (Complex Autism Program; CAP).

Study Design: Investigators will conduct a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) of social work consultation, ABHN, and ABHN+CAP.

Setting/Participants:Participants will be children age 5-12 years, diagnosed with an ASD, receiving care for ASD at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) in the Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (DBP), Division of Neurology, or in the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (DCAPBS), and exhibiting high levels of disruptive behaviors (defined as an elevated score on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability subscale and an elevated score on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S)). A parent of the child involved in coordinating the child's care will also be a participant in the study.

Study Interventions and Measures: Interventions include brief social work consultation, ABHN, and an interprofessional evaluation. The primary outcome measure will be the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability subscale. Secondary measures include the Clinical Global Impression - Severity and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-S and CGI-I), parent ratings of child behavior, parenting stress, and measures of feasibility and acceptability.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
42
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Child is age 5 through 12 years 11 months
  2. Diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and receives care for ASD at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (DBP) or Child Neurology, or in Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (DCAPBS)
  3. Child exhibits disruptive behaviors characterized by tantrums, outbursts, self-injurious, or aggressive behaviors with a Clinical Global Impression severity (CGI-S) for the disruptive behavior of at least 4
  4. A caregiver completed Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-2) Irritability subscale score is greater than 13
  5. A parent of the child who is involved in coordinating the child's care will also participate as a research subject.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Child requires crisis intervention or urgent psychiatric consultation
  2. Referring physician or psychologist will not be providing ongoing management of the child's behavioral challenges.
  3. Parent needs a different intervention or type of assistance than will be available through the study
  4. Families who live outside a 40 mile radius from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP -main)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Social Worker vs Autism Behavioral Health Navigation (ABHN)Autism Behavioral Health Navigation (ABHN)Phase 1: Families providing informed consent will then be randomized to social work consultation or to the Autism Behavioral Health Navigation (ABHN) intervention. Non-responders to ABHN will move to ABHN + Complex Autism Program (CAP).
Social Worker vs Autism Behavioral Health Navigation (ABHN)Social WorkerPhase 1: Families providing informed consent will then be randomized to social work consultation or to the Autism Behavioral Health Navigation (ABHN) intervention. Non-responders to ABHN will move to ABHN + Complex Autism Program (CAP).
Social work + ABHN vs Social work + ABHN + CAPSocial work + ABHNAt 3 months, children who are considered to be "responders" to their current treatment will continue; children who are "nonresponders" in the social work arm of the study will be randomized to either ABHN or ABHN+CAP. Children in the ABHN arm who are non-responders will receive ABHN + CAP
Social work + ABHN vs Social work + ABHN + CAPSocial work + ABHN + CAPAt 3 months, children who are considered to be "responders" to their current treatment will continue; children who are "nonresponders" in the social work arm of the study will be randomized to either ABHN or ABHN+CAP. Children in the ABHN arm who are non-responders will receive ABHN + CAP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of children referred to the study each month meeting eligibility requirements9 months

Prescribing clinicians from the following Divisions and Departments (DBP, Neurology, DCAPBS) will refer patients age 5-12 with ASD and disruptive behavior to the study. The number of children referred will be determined by counting the participants in the study who meet the inclusion criteria.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in levels of challenging behavior6 months

This will be measured by the Clinician Global Impression Scales (CGI). The CGI consists of a severity scale (CGI-S) and an Improvement scale (CGI-I). For the CGI-I, clinicians use record review to rate the level of change from the screening/baseline visit (1-3 indicating improvement, 4 indicating no change, 5-7 indicating a worsening of symptoms). The CGI-I will be completed at the 3- and 6-month follow up visits, and will measure the level of improvement compared to the CGI-S taken at screening/baseline.

Number of families successfully contacted by the navigator or social worker9 months

The number of families successfully contacted will be determined by reviewing contact logs of all contacts with the family and who initiated the contact; the duration of all contacts; the location of the contact; and the topic discussed, support provided, or toolkits reviewed.

Retention Rate9 months

The number of families retained will be determined by the number of families who complete treatment Phase 2

Changes in ABC-irritability subscale6 months

To meet eligibility the caregiver completed Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2) Irritability subscale score needs to be \> 13 (above the 50th percentile for children with ASD).This change will be measured by comparing the first stage interventions (SW vs. ABHN) and the change in ABC-irritability subscale score between baseline and the intermediate visit at month 3. At month 3, patients whose ABC Irritability subscale scores demonstrate improvement of at least 5 points (approximately ½ SD; moderate effect size) will remain in the same intervention. Patients whose ABC Irritability subscale scores suggest minimal to no improvement (less than 5 point improvement) will be randomized to either ABHN or ABHN+CAP if they were in the social work group in Phase 1 or will receive ABHN+CAP if they were in the ABHN arm of the study in phase 1. The primary efficacy endpoint for comparing the three embedded regimes will be ABC-irritability subscale at month 6.

Number of subjects consented9 months

The number of families consented will be measured by the percentage of eligible families consenting to the study

Changes (or Improvement) with interpersonal relationships9 months

This is a nine-item measure designed to assess satisfaction with the interpersonal relationship with the navigator or SW. The measure has been shown to have high internal consistency and to be significantly correlated with overall satisfaction with care and not to be correlated with health literacy or patients' primary language

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath