IRCT20230903059336N1Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Comparison between spinal epidural and Dural puncture epidural in natural childbirth analgesia
Karaj University of Medical Sciences0 sites98 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 98
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- no limit to no limit (—)
- Sex
- Female
Inclusion Criteria
- •pregnant women 37 to 40 weeks
- •women in the active stage of childbirth
- •vortex position
Exclusion Criteria
- •Non-vortex position
- •Increased intracranial pressure
- •Local infection at the injection site
- •Dissatisfaction of the pregnant women
- •Cardiac heart failure
- •Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- •Coagulation disorder
- •Anatomical deformity of the spine
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of dural puncture epidural technique with standard epidural technique in labor analgesia.CTRI/2019/09/021307MDM Hospital
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of pain relieving effects of Dural Puncture Epidural and Traditional Epidural in pregnant women who are in labourCTRI/2021/07/034773Dept of Anaesthesiology
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Pain relief for child birth by epidural anaesthesiaCTRI/2020/08/027060Dr Ashok Jadon
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Is Dural punctrue method better than standard method for epidural analgesia among women undergoing labourCTRI/2019/07/020222Dr Vasanthageethan R
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the effects of epidural and spinal anesthesia on the neonate blood gas born through normal deliveryIRCT20120215009014N256Hamedan University of Medical Sciences90