Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Registration Number
- NCT06649526
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation
- Detailed Description
Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery
Exclusion criteria Pregnancy Mallampati score III-IV Cormack-Lehane score III-IV ASA physical score III-IV sternomental distance < 12.5 cm mandibular-hyoid distance < 6 cm
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management 3 months The principal objective of this study was to undertake a comparative analysis of the images produced by two distinct VLs during direct and indirect laryngoscopy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital Cevizli D-100 Güney Yanyol, No:47 Kartal Istanbul Turkey
🇹🇷Istanbul, Turkey