Safety and Efficacy of the SurVeil™ Drug-Coated Balloon
- Conditions
- Peripheral Vascular DiseaseFemoropopliteal Artery OcclusionArtery Disease, PeripheralPeripheral Arterial Disease
- Interventions
- Device: Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral DCBDevice: Surmodics SurVeil DCB
- Registration Number
- NCT03241459
- Lead Sponsor
- SurModics, Inc.
- Brief Summary
To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the SurVeil Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) for treatment of subjects with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to stenosis of the femoral and/or popliteal arteries.
- Detailed Description
TRANSCEND is a prospective, multi-center, single-blind, randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical trial. The trial will randomize approximately 446 subjects with symptomatic PAD due to stenoses of the femoral and/or popliteal arteries. Subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with either the SurVeil DCB or the IN.PACT Admiral DCB, and followed for 60 months.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 446
- Subject is ≥18 years.
- Subject has target limb Rutherford classification 2, 3 or 4.
- Subject has provided written informed consent and is willing to comply with study follow-up requirements.
- De novo lesion(s) or non-stented restenotic lesion(s) occurring >90 days after prior plain old balloon (POBA) angioplasty or >180 days after prior DCB treatment.
- Target lesion location starts ≥10 mm below the common femoral bifurcation and terminates distally at or above the end of the P1 segment of the popliteal artery.
- Target vessel diameter ≥4 mm and ≤7 mm.
- Target lesion must have angiographic evidence of ≥70% stenosis by operator visual estimate.
- Chronic total occlusions may be included only after successful, uncomplicated wire crossing of target lesion via an anterograde approach and without the use of subintimal dissection techniques.
- Target lesion must be ≤180 mm in length (one long lesion or multiple serial lesions) by operator visual estimate. Note: combination lesions must have a total lesion length of ≤180 mm by visual estimate and be separated by ≤30 mm.
- Target lesion is located at least 30 mm from any stent, if target vessel was previously stented.
- Successful, uncomplicated (without use of a crossing device) wire crossing of target lesion. Successful crossing of the target lesion occurs when the tip of the guide wire is distal to the target lesion without the occurrence of flow-limiting dissection or perforation and is judged by visual inspection to be within the true lumen.
- After pre-dilatation, the target lesion is ≤70% residual stenosis, absence of a flow limiting dissection and treatable with available device matrix.
- A patent inflow artery free from significant stenosis (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography.
- At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle or foot, free from significant stenosis (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography.
- Subject has acute limb ischemia.
- Subject underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the target limb using plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or a stent within the previous 90 days.
- Subject underwent any lower extremity percutaneous treatment using a paclitaxel-eluting stent or a DCB within the previous 90 days.
- Subject underwent PTA of the target lesion using a DCB within the previous 180 days.
- Subject has had prior vascular intervention in the contralateral limb within 14 days before the planned study index procedure or subject has planned vascular intervention in the contralateral limb within 30 days after the index procedure.
- Subject is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant during the time of the study.
- Subject has life expectancy less than 2 years.
- Subject has a known allergy to contrast medium that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- Subject is allergic to ALL antiplatelet treatments.
- Subject has impaired renal function (i.e. serum creatinine level ≥2.5 mg/dL).
- Subject is dialysis dependent.
- Subject is receiving immunosuppressant therapy.
- Subject has known or suspected active infection at the time of the index procedure.
- Subject has platelet count <100,000/mm3 or >700,000/mm3.
- Subject has history of gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring a transfusion within 3 months prior to the study procedure.
- Subject is diagnosed with coagulopathy that precludes treatment with systemic anticoagulation and/or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).
- Subject has history of stroke within the past 90 days.
- Subject has a history of myocardial infarction within the past 30 days.
- Subject is unable to tolerate blood transfusions because of religious beliefs or other reasons.
- Subject is incarcerated, mentally incompetent, or abusing drugs or alcohol.
- Subject is participating in another investigational drug or medical device study that has not completed primary endpoint(s) evaluation or that clinically interferes with the endpoints from this study, or subject is planning to participate in such studies prior to the completion of this study.
- Subject has had any major (e.g. cardiac, peripheral, abdominal) surgical procedure or intervention unrelated to this study within 30 days prior to the index procedure or has planned major surgical procedure or intervention within 30 days of the index procedure.
- Subject had previous bypass surgery of the target lesion.
- Subject had previous treatment of the target vessel with thrombolysis or surgery.
- Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with procedures specified in the protocol or has difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits as specified by the protocol.
- Target lesion has severe calcification (as defined by the PARC classification of calcification).
- Target lesion involves an aneurysm or is adjacent to an aneurysm (within 5 mm).
- Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapy such as stenting, laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices, or subintimal dissection techniques.
- Significant target vessel tortuosity or other parameters prohibiting access to the target lesion.
- Presence of thrombus in the target vessel.
- Iliac inflow disease requiring treatment, unless the iliac artery disease is successfully treated first during the index procedure. Success is defined as ≤30% residual diameter stenosis without death or major complications.
- Presence of an aortic, iliac or femoral artificial graft.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral DCB Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral DCB Angioplasty procedure with a paclitaxel-coated, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon catheter. Surmodics SurVeil DCB Surmodics SurVeil DCB Surmodics SurVeil Drug-Coated Balloon is an investigational device coated with paclitaxel.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary Lesion Patency Though 12 Months 12 months Composite of freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and binary restenosis (restenosis defined as duplex ultrasound \[DUS\] peak systolic velocity ratio \[PSVR\] ≥2.4 or ≥50% stenosis as assessed by independent angiographic and DUS core labs) through 12 months post-index procedure.
Safety Composite of Freedom From Death, Amputation, and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) 12 months Composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days post-index procedure and freedom from major target limb amputation (above the ankle) and clinically-driven TVR through 12 months post-index procedure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of Participants With Device Success Day 0 Defined as successful delivery, balloon inflation, deflation and retrieval of the intact study device without burst below rated burst pressure, and achievement of \<50% residual stenosis of the target lesion (by core lab-assessed quantitative angiography \[QA\]) without flow-limiting arterial dissection (≥ 50% residual stenosis or dissection grade E or F) using only the study device.
Proportion of Participants With Technical Success Day 0 Defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (by core lab-assessed QA) without flow-limiting arterial dissection at the end of the procedure.
Proportion of Participants With Procedure Success 72 hours Defined as evidence of both acute technical success and absence of Peripheral Academic Research Consortium major adverse events (PARC MAEs; e.g., death, stroke, myocardial infarction, acute onset of limb ischemia, index bypass graft or treated segment thrombosis, and or need for urgent/emergent vascular surgery) within 72 hours of the index procedure.
Freedom From All-cause Death, Major Target Limb Amputation and TVR Through 30 Days 30 days Proportion of participation free of all-cause death, major target limb amputation and TVR through 30 days. All clinical endpoints adjudications by independent, blinded CEC.
Proportion of Participants With Primary Lesion Patency 24 months Primary patency through 24 months (only if both the primary safety and efficacy hypotheses of noninferiority are met).
Proportion of Participants With Target Vessel Patency 12 months, 24 months Defined as freedom from clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) and binary restenosis (restenosis defined as DUS PSVR ≥2.4 or ≥50% stenosis as assessed by independent angiographic and DUS core labs) within 12 and 24 months.
Proportion of Participants With Sustained Clinical Improvement 6 months, 12 months, 24 months Defined as freedom from major target limb amputation, TVR and worsening target limb Rutherford class, within 6, 12, and 24 months.
Proportion of Participants With a Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) 36 months, 48 months, 60 months Includes participants experiencing a clinically-driven target lesion revascularization event as reported by sites and adjudicated by an independent CEC.
Proportion of Participants With a Historical Major Adverse Events (MAEs) 36 months, 48 months, 60 months MAEs defined as composite of all-cause death, clinically-driven TLR, major target limb amputation, or thrombosis at the target lesion within 36, 48, and 60 months.
Proportion of Participants With a Major Target Limb Amputation 36 months, 48 months, 60 months Major target limb amputation within 36, 48, and 60 months as reported by site and adjudicated by CEC.
Proportion of Participants With a Thrombosis at the Target Lesion. 6 months, 12 months, 24 months Thrombosis at target lesion within 6, 12, 24 months as reported by the site and adjudicated by the CEC.
Change in Target Limb Rutherford Class Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months Change in target limb Rutherford class from Baseline (BL) to 1, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Rutherford classification criteria categorize the severity of chronic limb ischemia based on a clinical description of symptoms and pre-defined objective criteria.
Possible scores range from 0 to 6 (with lower scores representing a better outcome) with scores defined as follows:
0 - Asymptomatic - no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease
1. - Mild claudication
2. - Moderate claudication
3. - Severe claudication
4. - Ischemic rest pain
5. - Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia
6. - Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal) with all scores defined as follows:
Change = 1-Month scores - BL scores; 6-Month scores - BL scores; 12-Month scores - BL scores; 24-Month scores - BL scoresChange in Target Limb Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC) Class Screening, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months Change in target limb PARC class from baseline to 1, 6, 12, and 24 months.
PARC definitions of clinical symptom classification were used to classify subject claudication at baseline and subsequent follow-up visits. PARC clinical symptom classification is used to capture information regarding lower extremity symptoms and broadly define functional limitations of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD).
Possible classifications (asymptomatic=best outcome to ischemic gangrene=worst outcome) include the following:
Asymptomatic Mild claudication/limb symptoms (no limitation in walking) Moderate claudication/limb symptoms (able to walk without stopping \> 2 blocks or 200 meters or 4 minutes) Severe claudication/limb symptoms (only able to walk without stopping \< 2 blocks or 200 meters or 4 minutes) Ischemic rest pain (pain in the distal limb at rest, felt to be due to limited arterial perfusion) Ischemic ulcers on distal leg Ischemic gangrene
Change =Decrease in Target Limb Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) or Toe Brachial Index (TBI) Screening, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months Decrease in target limb resting ABI or TBI ≥0.15 from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months.
Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the ratio of the systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured at the ankle to that measured at the brachial artery.
Toe brachial index (TBI) is the ratio of SBP measured at the toe to that measured at the brachial artery.
if ABI could not be assessed, TBI could be used.Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) Screening, 1 month, 12 months, and 24 months Walking Impairment Questionnaire is a validated tool that has 4 domains (Walking Impairment, Walking Distance, Walking Speed, and Stair Climbing), each scored as a percent ranging from 0 (representing the inability to perform any of the tasks) to 100 (representing no difficulty with any of the tasks). A positive change in a score indicates an improvement.
Change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Screening, 12 months, and 24 months Change in 6MWT from baseline to 12 and 24 months.
Change in Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) Screening, 1 month, 12 months, and 24 months The PAQ consists of 7 domains including physical function, stability, symptom, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, social limitation, and summary. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a positive change indicating an improvement. Questionnaire responses include: Extremely Limited, Quite a bit Limited, Moderately Limited, Slightly Limited, Not at all Limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do the activity.
Proportion of Participants With a Thrombosis at the Target Lesion 36 months, 48 months, 60 months Thrombosis at target lesions within 36, 48, and 60 months as reported by the site and adjudicated by the CEC.
Trial Locations
- Locations (63)
Bryn Mawr Hospital - Main Line Health System (Einstein)
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Advocate Health
🇺🇸Naperville, Illinois, United States
Alexian Brothers Medical Center
🇺🇸Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
Cardiovascular Associates Research
🇺🇸Covington, Louisiana, United States
Virtua Medical Group, P.A.
🇺🇸Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/NYPH
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
North Carolina Heart and Vascular
🇺🇸Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Moses Cone-LeBauer
🇺🇸Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Mission Hospital
🇺🇸Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Capital Area Research
🇺🇸Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States
Prince of Wales Private Hostpital
🇦🇺Randwick, Australia
SRH Klinikum KarlsbadLangensteinbach
🇩🇪Karlsbad, Germany
The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
AZ Sint Blasius
🇧🇪Dendermonde, Belgium
Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
🇱🇻Riga, Latvia
Cardiovascular Associates of the Southeast
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Oklahoma Cardiovascular Research Group
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Providence Heart and Vascular
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Nebraska
🇺🇸Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Mission Cardiovascular Research Institute
🇺🇸Fremont, California, United States
Northeast Georgia Medical Center
🇺🇸Gainesville, Georgia, United States
North Ohio Heart Center
🇺🇸Elyria, Ohio, United States
Dignity Health
🇺🇸Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Cardiology Associates
🇺🇸Foley, Alabama, United States
Yuma Regional Medical Center
🇺🇸Yuma, Arizona, United States
Prairie Education (PERC)
🇺🇸Springfield, Illinois, United States
Piedmont Heart Insitute
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory University Hospital (Clifton)
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Advent Health Ocala/MediQuest Research Group LLC (formerly FL Hospital /Munroe)
🇺🇸Ocala, Florida, United States
Iowa Heart Center
🇺🇸West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Endovascular Technologies, LLC
🇺🇸Bossier City, Louisiana, United States
St Vincent Heart (Research Department)
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
North Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸Robbinsdale, Minnesota, United States
Mercy Hospital
🇺🇸Springfield, Missouri, United States
Hattiesburg Clinic
🇺🇸Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Northern Michigan Hospital
🇺🇸Petoskey, Michigan, United States
Ohio Health Research Institute
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Holy Name Medical Center
🇺🇸Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
St. Michael's Hospital
🇺🇸Newark, New Jersey, United States
Cleveland Clinic
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Toledo Medical Center
🇺🇸Toledo, Ohio, United States
Turkey Creek Medical Center
🇺🇸Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute
🇺🇸Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, United States
St. David's Heart & Vascular PLLC dba Austin Heart
🇺🇸Austin, Texas, United States
Ballad Health System
🇺🇸Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Institution Medizinische Universitat
🇦🇹Graz, Austria
Houston Cardiovascular Association
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Vitkovicka Nemocnice Ostrava Vítkovická nemocnice, a.s.,
🇨🇿Ostrava, Czechia
UZ GENT
🇧🇪Ghent, Belgium
FN u sv. Anny v Brně a LF MU (Centrum cévních onemocnění II. chirurgická klinika)
🇨🇿Brno, Czechia
Auckland City Hospital
🇳🇿Auckland, New Zealand
Aou Careggi University Hospital
🇮🇹Florence, Italy
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
🇩🇪Leipzig, Germany
Herz Zentrum Bad Krozingen Südring
🇩🇪Bad Krozingen, Germany
REGIOMED-KLINIKEN GmbH
🇩🇪Sonneberg, Germany
Beth Israel Deaconess
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants
🇺🇸Clearwater, Florida, United States
North Dallas Research Associates
🇺🇸McKinney, Texas, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
The Miriam Hospital
🇺🇸Providence, Rhode Island, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
🇺🇸Kansas City, Kansas, United States