MedPath

Comparison of Knotless Barbed Suture and Standard Suture in Knee Replacement Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Knee Osteoarthritis
Hip Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Device: barbed suture
Device: standard suture
Registration Number
NCT03031314
Lead Sponsor
Washington Hospital Healthcare System
Brief Summary

Barbed suture use has been gaining increased acceptance and has been reported to offer potential advantages in wound closure of hip and knee replacement surgeries.

The goal of this study is to compare joint replacement patient outcomes who receive a knotless barbed suture versus a traditional suture (randomized into two arms). The traditional suture used at our joint replacement program is defined as: interrupted sutures to close the retinaculum followed by running monocryl sutures for skin closure. Both knotless barbed suture and the traditional sutures have similar suture size.

Patient outcomes examined will be patient range of motion (recorded daily) and complications with wound healing (evaluated periodically in-person at post-operative visits).

Secondary outcomes examined will include wound drainage on dressings by surface area and weight, as well as the wound cosmesis and perceived presence of subcutaneous surgical knots.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1000
Inclusion Criteria
  • primary joint replacement
Exclusion Criteria
  • no prior joint surgery
  • no infection

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Barbed suturebarbed suturebarbed suture used (Quill suture, Surgical Specialties)
Standard suturestandard suturestandard suture used (monocryl)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of soft tissue infections12 weeks

evaluation of wound infection after surgery, number of patients with wound infection based on clinical examination

use of antibiotics to treat infection, recorded by number12 weeks

record whether antibiotics used for suspicion or treatment of superficial infection, number of episodes recorded

measurement of incision drainage, measured in grams and mm surface area2 weeks

evaluation of incision drainage based on dressing saturation size and weight, measured in grams for weight, and measured by surface area mm

assessment of quality of incision closure, recorded by time and number12 weeks

record delayed healing and reported by time, suture rejection based on number of episodes

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath