Comparison of Knotless Barbed Suture and Standard Suture in Knee Replacement Patients
- Conditions
- Knee OsteoarthritisHip Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Device: barbed sutureDevice: standard suture
- Registration Number
- NCT03031314
- Lead Sponsor
- Washington Hospital Healthcare System
- Brief Summary
Barbed suture use has been gaining increased acceptance and has been reported to offer potential advantages in wound closure of hip and knee replacement surgeries.
The goal of this study is to compare joint replacement patient outcomes who receive a knotless barbed suture versus a traditional suture (randomized into two arms). The traditional suture used at our joint replacement program is defined as: interrupted sutures to close the retinaculum followed by running monocryl sutures for skin closure. Both knotless barbed suture and the traditional sutures have similar suture size.
Patient outcomes examined will be patient range of motion (recorded daily) and complications with wound healing (evaluated periodically in-person at post-operative visits).
Secondary outcomes examined will include wound drainage on dressings by surface area and weight, as well as the wound cosmesis and perceived presence of subcutaneous surgical knots.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1000
- primary joint replacement
- no prior joint surgery
- no infection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Barbed suture barbed suture barbed suture used (Quill suture, Surgical Specialties) Standard suture standard suture standard suture used (monocryl)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of soft tissue infections 12 weeks evaluation of wound infection after surgery, number of patients with wound infection based on clinical examination
use of antibiotics to treat infection, recorded by number 12 weeks record whether antibiotics used for suspicion or treatment of superficial infection, number of episodes recorded
measurement of incision drainage, measured in grams and mm surface area 2 weeks evaluation of incision drainage based on dressing saturation size and weight, measured in grams for weight, and measured by surface area mm
assessment of quality of incision closure, recorded by time and number 12 weeks record delayed healing and reported by time, suture rejection based on number of episodes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method