Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis and Ambisome Aerosol with Itraconazole
- Conditions
- Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03656081
- Lead Sponsor
- Poitiers University Hospital
- Brief Summary
This study compares the therapeutic (clinical and radiological) efficacy of a six-month treatment by itraconazole and nebulised Ambisome® (liposomal amphotericin B = LAmB) versus treatment by itraconazole alone, in non - or mildly - immunocompromised patients affected by Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis (single aspergilloma excluded).
• Control arm: Itraconazole 200 mg x 2/day associated with inactive nebulised treatment twice a week during 24 weeks.
• Experimental arm: Itraconazole 200 mg x 2/day associated with nebulised LAmB, at 25 mg twice a week during 24 weeks.
Follow up duration for the patients will be 24 months (12 months minimum) after discontinuation of the treatment being studied.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 224
All adult patients affected with Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CPA) "de novo" or in relapse (without any history of resistance to itraconazole) combining the following criteria are eligible:
-
Patient with an Aspergillus bronchopulmonary infection, be it cavitary, fibrotic, necrotizing (SIA/Semi Invasive Aspergillosis) or nodular and documented by compatible thoracic CT-scan images ;
-
Associated with one of the following criteria:
- positive detection of anti-Aspergillus IgG and/or precipitating anti-aspergillus antibodies, according to the positivity threshold of the laboratory performing the technique,
- positive direct examination of Aspergillus or positive culture, from bronchopulmonary samples (expectoration or endoscopic aspiration),
- revealing aspergillar hyphae/filaments on histological samples
-
Men or women age ≥ 18 years;
-
For the women of childbearing age: women having a negative serum pregnancy test, having a contraception highly effective and accepting to pursue it during at least the first 12 months of the study;
-
Patient legally free and not subject to any custody, guardianship, tutelage or subordination measures;
-
Participants must be affiliated to France's Health Care Regime (" Sécurité Sociale ");
-
Free and informed consent signed by each participating patient.
-
- Patient affected with single aspergilloma
-
- Patient presenting a contraindication to itraconazole (including all contraindicated co-administrated medications as listed in the itraconazole SmPc, including notably medications with potential to prolong theQT interval)
-
- Patient presenting a contraindication to voriconazole and posaconazole (including all contraindicated coadministrated medications as listed in the SmPc)
-
- Intolerance to beta2-agonists
-
- Notion of relapse with isolation of an Aspergillus resistant to itraconazole
-
- History of hypersensitivity reaction to liposomal amphotericin B or to itraconazole or to any other constituent
-
- Patient having presented complications related to a previous treatment by nebulised LAmB
-
- Patient received an oral (excepted oral Amphotericin B), parenteral or intra-cavity antifungal treatment within the last 2 months
-
- Severe renal failure (clearance <30 ml / min).
-
- Hepatic failure with transaminase and alkaline phosphatase values > 5 times normal
-
- Significant abnormality of the blood cell and platelet counts (at the discretion of the investigator)
-
- Concomitant use of one or several of treatments contra-indicated with the experimental or non-experimental treatment
-
- Ventricular dysfunction such as congestive cardiac failure or history of congestive cardiac failure or patients with risk(s) factors of cardiac arrhythmia or symptomatic arrhythmia with a prolongation of the corrected QT interval > 450 msec in men and 470 msec in women or treated by medication known to prolong QT interval, or prolongation of the corrected QT interval > 450 msec in men and 470 msec in women.
-
- Invasive pulmonary Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis
-
- Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis with indication for surgical intervention within 6 months from the start
-
- Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
-
- Immunocompromised patients
-
- Threatening hemoptysis, with impossibility to defer surgical procedures (but patients contraindicated to surgery may be included after resolution of the hemoptysis)
-
- Tuberculosis or progressive non-tuberculous mycobacteria
-
- Respiratory infection aggravating the underlying CPA (patient may be included after eradication of infection)
-
- Patient refusing to participate
-
- Protected majors in the meaning of the law, non affiliated persons or with no social security scheme, persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons staying in a health or social institution, adults under legal protection, and finally patients in emergencies.
-
- Patient in exclusion period following participation in another interventional study evaluating antifungals or medicines
-
- Women at age to procreate and not using highly effective contraception, pregnant or breastfeeding women
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Itraconazole & inhaled placebo inhaled placebo Itraconazole 200 mg x 2/day associated with inactive nebulised treatment (isotonic saline) twice a week during 24 weeks. Itraconazole & inhaled Ambisome® inhaled Ambisome® Itraconazole 200 mg x 2/day associated with inhaled liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome®) at 25 mg twice a week during 24 weeks Itraconazole & inhaled placebo Itraconazole Itraconazole 200 mg x 2/day associated with inactive nebulised treatment (isotonic saline) twice a week during 24 weeks. Itraconazole & inhaled Ambisome® Itraconazole Itraconazole 200 mg x 2/day associated with inhaled liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome®) at 25 mg twice a week during 24 weeks
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Composite efficacy criterion defined by the association of clinical improvement/stability and radiological improvement evaluated at 6 months 6 months • Clinical improvement or stability is evaluated using the Respiratory Symptom Score based on 6 items (cough, expectoration, dyspnea, hemoptysis, chest pain, and nocturnal awakening ) quoted with a 10 cm visual analogical scale).
Stability is defined by a score variation between -25 and +25%, while improvement is defined by a decrease in score greater than 25%.
• Radiological improvement is based on the analysis of CT-scan parameters (a committee consisting on two chest radiologists wil perform centrally and parallel analyses of each CT-scan blinded to the study treatment allocation to reach a final decision by consensus)
The radiological improvement (binary variable) is defined by a consensual score based on the evolution of the various radiological parameters (cavity, fungus ball, alveolar condensation, nodules) according to validated thresholds.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method major events during follow-up period month 6 to month 30 relapse month 6 to month 30 mycological response after 3 months and 6 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHU Poitiers
🇫🇷Poitiers, France