跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00147693
NCT00147693已完成不适用

Systematic Care for Informal Caregivers of Dementia Patients: An Efficient Approach?

Radboud University Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 304 人开始时间: 2005年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
304
试验地点
1
主要终点
Patients admissions to nursing homes or residential homes. This outcome is the most important input for the estimation of cost differences between the intervention group and controls.

研究概览

简要总结

The objective is to ascertain the potential efficiency of a systematic care programme for caregivers of dementia patients. The research questions are:

  • What are the costs and benefits of the Systematic Care Programme - Dementia (SCP-Dementia), as compared with usual care?
  • What are the effects on the quality of life of patients and informal caregivers (spouse, relative), as compared with usual care?

详细描述

A major challenge for future health care is the care for dementia patients and their informal caregivers. In usual care, the problems of caregivers often remain invisible until a crisis occurs. This inhibition is partly the result of informal caregivers paying scant attention to their own problems. Another reason is that professionals may not know how to support informal caregivers pro-actively (Van Hout et al., 2000). Therefore the family support programme (Bengtson, 1985: Vernooij et al., 2000) has been transformed into a Systematic Care Programme (SCP-Dementia). The reasons for choosing and studying the efficiency of this programme are the potential to diagnose and treat problems systematically, to cover a wide range of individual problems, its flexibility in connecting interventions to these problems, its suitability for pro-activity and the positive effects of the programme found in our previous study (Vernooij et al., 2000). To study its efficiency a cluster randomised controlled trial design will be used. Randomisation will take place in each of three participating regions. Professionals in the ambulatory mental health care services (psychologists and social psychiatric nurses) will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group before the recruitment of patients and informal caregivers. The study population consists of pairs of patients and their informal caregivers visiting the ambulatory mental health care service for the first time. The intervention is the training in SCP-Dementia and its subsequent use. SCP-Dementia consists of an assessment of the caregiver's sense of competence and suggestions on how to deal with deficiencies in competence. The follow-up period is one year. The primary outcome is patients´ admissions to nursing homes or residential homes. The secondary outcome is quality of life. Caregivers´ quality of life is assessed by sense of competence (SCQ), depression (CES-D) and physical quality of life (EuroQol). Patients´ quality of life by behavioral problems is assessed by the NPI-Q and the QOL-AD-Scale. The difference in proposed effect was based on previous research in which 14% of the patients in the intervention group and 28% in the control group were institutionalized (Vernooij-Dassen, 1993;1995). To detect a 50% reduction in institutionalization rates with 80% power at the two sided significance level of 0.05, 132 patient-caregiver dyads would be needed for each of the intervention and control arm. We inflated this sample size by a design effect of 1.15 to 152 dyads per trial arm to allow for correlation of dyads within the same cluster (i.e. professional), assuming an average cluster size of four and an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.05. Assuming a 25% dropout rate of patient-caregiver dyads, the study needed an final enrolment of 190 dyads in each trial arm. The economic evaluation is a cost-effectiveness analysis regarding a societal perspective. In the economic evaluation both costs and effects will be monetarized and consequently will result in a net benefit.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Pairs of patients and their informal caregivers visiting the ambulatory mental health care service for the first time and treated by the professionals participating in the study

排除标准

  • Patients and caregivers not mastering the Dutch language

结局指标

主要结局

Patients admissions to nursing homes or residential homes. This outcome is the most important input for the estimation of cost differences between the intervention group and controls.

时间窗: after one year follow-up period

次要结局

  • Secondary outcome for cost estimation is patient and caregiver related costs estimated by "Resource Utilisation in Dementia" (RUD), including time spent on caregiving, use of health care services by caregivers and patients and additional productivity.

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验