Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01477151
NCT01477151
Completed
Phase 4

Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lawson Health Research Institute1 site in 1 country464 target enrollmentNovember 2011

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Volatile anesthetic
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Sponsor
Lawson Health Research Institute
Enrollment
464
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Composite of: prolonged ICU stay (>= 48 hours) OR death within 30 days of operation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Anesthesia practice in the 21st century is increasingly outcomes-oriented and evidence-based, but there remain significant gaps in our knowledge, even for commonly-encountered clinical situations. Currently, the two most commonly used drugs used for maintenance of anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients are isoflurane and sevoflurane. There is a belief among many cardiac anesthesiologists that sevoflurane is a better cardiac anesthetic than isoflurane, but there is very little data to support this notion. In fact, very little is known about their comparative effects on important patient outcomes because there has not been a large head-to-head prospective randomized clinical trial. This project will supply the data necessary to critically compare the two anesthetics.

Detailed Description

Current evidence supports the superiority of sevoflurane for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery when compared to total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. However, there is no evidence to suggest that sevoflurane is superior to isoflurane for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. Sevoflurane may potentially reduce the rate of post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation and the time to tracheal extubation compared to isoflurane, but the literature is equivocal on these two important outcomes. Anesthesiologists still frequently use isoflurane for maintenance of cardiac anesthesia, and this is likely because there is substantial uncertainty about whether or not sevoflurane is superior to isoflurane, given the lack of head-to-head RCTs. A large, prospective, pragmatic RCT can ultimately assist clinicians by providing evidence of the non-inferiority (or, possibly the superiority) of one anesthetic compared to the other on important patient outcomes such as ICU length of stay, mortality, renal dysfunction, time to tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery, rates of clinically-important atrial fibrillation, and myocardial damage.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2011
End Date
March 2015
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Philip Jones

Principal Investigator

Lawson Health Research Institute

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients must be 18 years or over (There is no upper age limit to enrollment)
  • Eligible procedures are: CABG on-pump or off-pump, single valve repair/replacement, or CABG/single valve combined procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cardiac surgeries that are not one of the included cases
  • Planned extubation in the operating room
  • Patients refusing blood products (vis à vis blood sampling)
  • Pregnant patients
  • Malignant hyperthermia or documented/stated allergy to potent volatile anesthetic agents

Arms & Interventions

sevoflurane

These patients will receive sevoflurane as the volatile anesthetic pre-, during-, and post-cardiopulmonary bypass at a targeted dose of 0.5-2.0 MAC.

Intervention: Volatile anesthetic

isoflurane

These patients will receive isoflurane as the volatile anesthetic pre-, during-, and post-cardiopulmonary bypass at a targeted dose of 0.5-2.0 MAC.

Intervention: Volatile anesthetic

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Composite of: prolonged ICU stay (>= 48 hours) OR death within 30 days of operation

Time Frame: 30 days of operation

Secondary Outcomes

  • Postoperative cardiac troponin T(6 hours after admission to ICU)
  • Length of stay in the ICU (criteria)(Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day)
  • 30-day all-cause mortality(30 days after operation)
  • Peak postoperative serum creatinine(Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week)
  • 1-year all-cause mortality(One year after operation)
  • Prolonged inotrope or vasopressor usage in the ICU(Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day)
  • New-onset dialysis(Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week)
  • Incidence of intra-aortic balloon pump usage(Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day)
  • Length of stay in the ICU (actual)(Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day)
  • Perioperative stroke(Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week)
  • Inotrope or vasopressor usage in the ICU(Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day)
  • Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation(Until end of post-operative day 4)
  • Duration of tracheal intubation(Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day)
  • Readmission to ICU(Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week)
  • Length of stay in the hospital (actual)(Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials