跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04405011
NCT04405011Unknown不适用

Role of Nucleoside Analogue in Preventing Clinical Reactivation of HBV in HCV/HBV Co-infected Patients Receiving DAA Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C

National Taiwan University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2018年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
HBV virologic and clinical reactivation rates

研究概览

简要总结

HBV reactivation is common in HCV/HBV coinfected patients receiving DAA therapy for chronic hepatitis C. How to prevent HBV reactivation remains unclear. In this trial, we aim to investigate whether prophylactic nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) at the start of DAA could prevent HBV reactivation or not. And whether prolonged NUC prophylaxis (24 weeks) would be better than 12-week prophylaxis. This will be a three-arm, open-label, randomized, active controlled, study. Totally, 60 HBV/HCV co-infected treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced patients without decompensated liver cirrhosis will be included in this study. Group 1 patients (n=20) will receive 12-week ETV from the start of DAA therapy. Group 2 patients (n=20) will receive 24-week ETV from the start of DAA till 12 weeks after end of DAA. Group 3 patients (n=20) will not receive ETV during the period of DAA and will serve as controls. The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be compared among 3 groups of patients. Expected outcomes: The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be lower in the ETV prophylaxis group, and will be the lowest in the group receiving 24-week ETV prophylaxis.

详细描述

We will determine the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC, in two prophylactic groups versus control group. We will also examine whether extending the duration of prophylactic NUC would be more beneficial than the 3-month prophylaxis regimen.

Patients with the following criteria will be enrolled: age ≥20 years; anti-HCV positive and HCV RNA >1000 IU/ml; any HCV genotype; all received 12 weeks of DAA treatment; treatment naïve or experienced of pegylated interferon/ribavirin; concurrent HBV infection which is defined by positive HBsAg for at least 6 months. Patients with the following criteria will be excluded: history of treatment regimen that included any kind of direct antiviral agents; presence of other etiology of chronic hepatitis including HIV, autoimmune hepatitis, NASH, etc; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (Hba1c >8.5); current evidence or suspicion of malignancy; severe cardiovascular or other severe comorbid diseases; autoimmune disorders; presence of liver cirrhosis clinically or pathologically; any one of following hematology or biochemical or clinical abnormalities: AST/ALT >10x ULN, Albumin <3.5g/dL, Bilirubin >2.5mg/dL, eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2, prothrombin time prolongation >4 sec or INR >1.7, platelet count <100 x 103 uL, and history or presence of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy; child-bearing age women without the willing to contraceptive control; and pregnant women or lactating women.

Briefly, 60 HCV/HBV coinfected patients will be enrolled and randomized to receive 12-week DAA regimen for reimbursed for the the treatment of patients with CHC in Taiwan.

Entecavir (0.5mg; ETV) 1 # daily will be used in the prophylactic group. Group 1 patients (n=20) will receive 12-week ETV from the start of DAA therapy. Group 2 patients (n=20) will receive 24-week ETV from the start of DAA till 12 weeks after end of DAA. Group 3 patients (n=20) will not receive ETV during the period of DAA and serve as controls. The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be compared among 3 groups of patients.

The primary endpoint will be the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC. Secondary objectives include the rate of HBV virologic and clinical reactivation between 12-week versus 24-week entecavir (ETV) prophylaxis during and after DAA treatment; the profiles of serum HBV DNA/qHBsAg during and after DAA treatment; and sustained virological response at post-DAA treatment 12 weeks (SVR12).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Entecavir 0.5mg daily for 24 weeks

Experimental

Entecavir will be delivered for 24-week and will be the experimental arm

干预措施: 24-week Entecavir (Drug)

Entecavir 0.5mg daily for 12 weeks

Active Comparator

12-week entecavir will be served as active comparator

干预措施: 12-week Entecavir (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

HBV virologic and clinical reactivation rates

时间窗: 72 weeks

The primary endpoint will be the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC.

次要结局

  • Profiles of serum HBV DNA/qHBsAg during and after DAA treatment.(72 weeks)
  • HBV reactivation rate: 12-week prophylaxis versus 24-week prophylaxis(72 weeks)
  • Sustained virological response at post-DAA treatment 12 weeks (SVR12)(72 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

NUC in Preventing HBV Reactivation in HCV/HBV... | 临床试验