MedPath

NUC in Preventing HBV Reactivation in HCV/HBV Co-infected Patients Receiving DAA for CHC

Not Applicable
Conditions
HBV/HCV Co-infection
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04405011
Lead Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Brief Summary

HBV reactivation is common in HCV/HBV coinfected patients receiving DAA therapy for chronic hepatitis C. How to prevent HBV reactivation remains unclear. In this trial, we aim to investigate whether prophylactic nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) at the start of DAA could prevent HBV reactivation or not. And whether prolonged NUC prophylaxis (24 weeks) would be better than 12-week prophylaxis. This will be a three-arm, open-label, randomized, active controlled, study. Totally, 60 HBV/HCV co-infected treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced patients without decompensated liver cirrhosis will be included in this study. Group 1 patients (n=20) will receive 12-week ETV from the start of DAA therapy. Group 2 patients (n=20) will receive 24-week ETV from the start of DAA till 12 weeks after end of DAA. Group 3 patients (n=20) will not receive ETV during the period of DAA and will serve as controls. The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be compared among 3 groups of patients. Expected outcomes: The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be lower in the ETV prophylaxis group, and will be the lowest in the group receiving 24-week ETV prophylaxis.

Detailed Description

We will determine the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC, in two prophylactic groups versus control group. We will also examine whether extending the duration of prophylactic NUC would be more beneficial than the 3-month prophylaxis regimen.

Patients with the following criteria will be enrolled: age ≥20 years; anti-HCV positive and HCV RNA \>1000 IU/ml; any HCV genotype; all received 12 weeks of DAA treatment; treatment naïve or experienced of pegylated interferon/ribavirin; concurrent HBV infection which is defined by positive HBsAg for at least 6 months. Patients with the following criteria will be excluded: history of treatment regimen that included any kind of direct antiviral agents; presence of other etiology of chronic hepatitis including HIV, autoimmune hepatitis, NASH, etc; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (Hba1c \>8.5); current evidence or suspicion of malignancy; severe cardiovascular or other severe comorbid diseases; autoimmune disorders; presence of liver cirrhosis clinically or pathologically; any one of following hematology or biochemical or clinical abnormalities: AST/ALT \>10x ULN, Albumin \<3.5g/dL, Bilirubin \>2.5mg/dL, eGFR \<30 ml/min/1.73m2, prothrombin time prolongation \>4 sec or INR \>1.7, platelet count \<100 x 103 uL, and history or presence of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy; child-bearing age women without the willing to contraceptive control; and pregnant women or lactating women.

Briefly, 60 HCV/HBV coinfected patients will be enrolled and randomized to receive 12-week DAA regimen for reimbursed for the the treatment of patients with CHC in Taiwan.

Entecavir (0.5mg; ETV) 1 # daily will be used in the prophylactic group. Group 1 patients (n=20) will receive 12-week ETV from the start of DAA therapy. Group 2 patients (n=20) will receive 24-week ETV from the start of DAA till 12 weeks after end of DAA. Group 3 patients (n=20) will not receive ETV during the period of DAA and serve as controls. The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be compared among 3 groups of patients.

The primary endpoint will be the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC. Secondary objectives include the rate of HBV virologic and clinical reactivation between 12-week versus 24-week entecavir (ETV) prophylaxis during and after DAA treatment; the profiles of serum HBV DNA/qHBsAg during and after DAA treatment; and sustained virological response at post-DAA treatment 12 weeks (SVR12).

The data will be expressed as percentages for category variables and as mean +- standard deviation for continuous variables. Category variables will be evaluated by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test will be applied for comparison of the continuous variables. Multivariate analysis will be used to identify factors that are associated with HBV reactivation. A p value less than 0.05 is considered to be significant.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
FACTORIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Entecavir 0.5mg daily for 24 weeks24-week EntecavirEntecavir will be delivered for 24-week and will be the experimental arm
Entecavir 0.5mg daily for 12 weeks12-week Entecavir12-week entecavir will be served as active comparator
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
HBV virologic and clinical reactivation rates72 weeks

The primary endpoint will be the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Profiles of serum HBV DNA/qHBsAg during and after DAA treatment.72 weeks

The profiles of HBV DNA and qHBsAg will be compared among 3 study groups

HBV reactivation rate: 12-week prophylaxis versus 24-week prophylaxis72 weeks

12 weeks or 24 weeks of ETV prophylaxis in the control of HBV activity during and after DAA treatment

Sustained virological response at post-DAA treatment 12 weeks (SVR12)72 weeks

The SVR12 will be compared among 3 study groups

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

TC Chen

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

National Taiwan University Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei City, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath