Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Labor InductionCervical Ripening
- Interventions
- Device: Double balloon catheter
- Registration Number
- NCT01170819
- Lead Sponsor
- Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
- Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy of transcervical double balloon catheters versus controlled release dinoprostone vaginal inserts for pre-induction cervical ripening in term women with unfavourable cervices.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 210
Inclusion Criteria
- singleton gestation
- gestational age greater than 34 weeks
- cephalic presentation
- intact membranes
- Bishop score of ≤4
- reactive fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern on admission
Exclusion Criteria
- any condition precluding vaginal delivery
- any contraindication to receiving prostaglandins, including history of asthma, glaucoma, or cardiac or cardiovascular disease
- previous cesarean section or other uterine incision
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Double Balloon Catheter Double balloon catheter - Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert Dinoprostone 10 mg controlled-release vaginal insert -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Vaginal delivery within 24 hours 24 hours from start of cervical ripening
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cesarean section rate 48 hours from start of ripening Uterine hyperstimulation 12 hours (double ballon catheter arm) and 24 hours (dinoprostone vaginal insert arm) from start of ripening Onset of active labor 36 hours from start of ripening Active labor is defined as at least 4 uterine contractions in a 30 minutes interval with a totally effaced cervix and a cervical dilatation ≥3 cm
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Del Ponte Hospital
🇮🇹Varese, Italy