MedPath

Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Labor Induction
Cervical Ripening
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01170819
Lead Sponsor
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Brief Summary

To compare the efficacy of transcervical double balloon catheters versus controlled release dinoprostone vaginal inserts for pre-induction cervical ripening in term women with unfavourable cervices.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
210
Inclusion Criteria
  • singleton gestation
  • gestational age greater than 34 weeks
  • cephalic presentation
  • intact membranes
  • Bishop score of ≤4
  • reactive fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern on admission
Exclusion Criteria
  • any condition precluding vaginal delivery
  • any contraindication to receiving prostaglandins, including history of asthma, glaucoma, or cardiac or cardiovascular disease
  • previous cesarean section or other uterine incision

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Double Balloon CatheterDouble balloon catheter-
Dinoprostone Vaginal InsertDinoprostone 10 mg controlled-release vaginal insert-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Vaginal delivery within 24 hours24 hours from start of cervical ripening
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cesarean section rate48 hours from start of ripening
Uterine hyperstimulation12 hours (double ballon catheter arm) and 24 hours (dinoprostone vaginal insert arm) from start of ripening
Onset of active labor36 hours from start of ripening

Active labor is defined as at least 4 uterine contractions in a 30 minutes interval with a totally effaced cervix and a cervical dilatation ≥3 cm

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Del Ponte Hospital

🇮🇹

Varese, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath