Accuracy of Half-guided Implant Placement
- Conditions
- Partial-edentulism
- Interventions
- Procedure: Half-guided implant placement
- Registration Number
- NCT04854239
- Lead Sponsor
- Semmelweis University
- Brief Summary
The aim of the present prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the accuracy of implant placement performed either with a surgical motor or a torque wrench as part of a half-guided surgical protocol after maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
- Detailed Description
Implant insertion with half-guided surgical protocol was utilized by surgical motor (machine-driven group) or torque wrench (manual group) in the maxilla. Forty patients were randomly divided in two study groups; 20 implants were inserted with a surgical motor and 20 implants with a torque wrench. After the healing period, accuracy comparison method between planned and actual implant positions was performed based on digital intraoral scan. Coronal, apical and angular deviation parameters, insertion time and maximum insertion torque was evaluated.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- at least one edentulous maxillary premolar or molar site treated successfully by sinus floor elevation with a xenogenic bone substitute (cerabone, botiss biomaterials, Zossen, Germany) confirmed by preoperative cone-beam computed tomography
- full- mouth plaque and bleeding scores (FMPS and FMBS) <20%
- good patient compliance (including willingness to participate in the follow-up procedures)
- signed informed consent
- clinically relevant diseases (e.g.: diabetes, rheumatism, cancer)
- systemic steroid or bisphosphonate use
- acute or chronic inflammatory processes
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Machine-driven group Half-guided implant placement In the machine-driven group, after guided implant bed preparation, implant insertion was performed with contra-angled handpiece. Manual group Half-guided implant placement In the manual group, after guided implant bed preparation, implant insertion was performed with torque-wrench.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Global apical implant position deviation 3 months after implant placement Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm
Horizontal coronal implant position deviation 3 months after implant placement Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm
Global coronal implant position deviation 3 months after implant placement Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm
Horizontal apical implant position deviation 3 months after implant placement Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm
Angular implant position deviation 3 months after implant placement Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implant insertion torque During implant insertion Measurement: Insertion torque. Tool: surgical motor Unit: Ncm
Duration of implant insertion During implant insertion Measurement: Duration of implant insertion Tool: stopwatch Unit: seconds
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Semmelweis University Department of Periodontology
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡ºBudapest, Hungary