MedPath

Accuracy of Half-guided Implant Placement

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Partial-edentulism
Interventions
Procedure: Half-guided implant placement
Registration Number
NCT04854239
Lead Sponsor
Semmelweis University
Brief Summary

The aim of the present prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the accuracy of implant placement performed either with a surgical motor or a torque wrench as part of a half-guided surgical protocol after maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

Detailed Description

Implant insertion with half-guided surgical protocol was utilized by surgical motor (machine-driven group) or torque wrench (manual group) in the maxilla. Forty patients were randomly divided in two study groups; 20 implants were inserted with a surgical motor and 20 implants with a torque wrench. After the healing period, accuracy comparison method between planned and actual implant positions was performed based on digital intraoral scan. Coronal, apical and angular deviation parameters, insertion time and maximum insertion torque was evaluated.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • at least one edentulous maxillary premolar or molar site treated successfully by sinus floor elevation with a xenogenic bone substitute (cerabone, botiss biomaterials, Zossen, Germany) confirmed by preoperative cone-beam computed tomography
  • full- mouth plaque and bleeding scores (FMPS and FMBS) <20%
  • good patient compliance (including willingness to participate in the follow-up procedures)
  • signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • clinically relevant diseases (e.g.: diabetes, rheumatism, cancer)
  • systemic steroid or bisphosphonate use
  • acute or chronic inflammatory processes

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Machine-driven groupHalf-guided implant placementIn the machine-driven group, after guided implant bed preparation, implant insertion was performed with contra-angled handpiece.
Manual groupHalf-guided implant placementIn the manual group, after guided implant bed preparation, implant insertion was performed with torque-wrench.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Global apical implant position deviation3 months after implant placement

Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm

Horizontal coronal implant position deviation3 months after implant placement

Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm

Global coronal implant position deviation3 months after implant placement

Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm

Horizontal apical implant position deviation3 months after implant placement

Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm

Angular implant position deviation3 months after implant placement

Measurement: comparison of planned and actual implant position in a virtual model. Tool: Linear measurement with Amira 5.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Unit: mm

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implant insertion torqueDuring implant insertion

Measurement: Insertion torque. Tool: surgical motor Unit: Ncm

Duration of implant insertionDuring implant insertion

Measurement: Duration of implant insertion Tool: stopwatch Unit: seconds

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Semmelweis University Department of Periodontology

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath