Orotracheal Intubation in Newborns: Videolaryngoscopy Vs Direct Laryngoscopy
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- The Time Taken for Successful Tracheal Intubation in Each Technique
- Sponsor
- Tunis University
- Enrollment
- 115
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- time taken for successful tracheal intubation
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group)
Detailed Description
prospective randomized study including newborns , requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group).
Investigators
Mehdi Trifa
Head of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department
Tunis University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •newborns requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit
Exclusion Criteria
- •age\> 01 month
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
time taken for successful tracheal intubation
Time Frame: during intubation
Secondary Outcomes
- the need for additional device(during intubation)
- the number of attempts(during intubation)
- Complications during intubation(during intubation)