Diagnostic Accuracy of CCTA-derived Versus AngiogRaphy-dErived QuantitativE Flow Ratio (CAREER) Study
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery DiseaseHemodynamicsCoronary Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Stenosis
- Registration Number
- NCT04665817
- Lead Sponsor
- Fudan University
- Brief Summary
To perform CT-QFR, invasive coronary angiography, FFR, and QFR tests on patients with moderate coronary stenosis after coronary CTA examination. Use FFR as a reference to verify the diagnostic performance of CT-QFR, and compare it with QFR.
- Detailed Description
This study is a prospective and single-center trial in China.It intends to enroll 216 patients with coronary artery disease whose coronary artery is determined to be 30-90% stenosis after coronary CT scan. CT image data will be imported for CT-QFR detection and undergo coronary angiography within 30 days. Quantitative analysis of coronary angiography (QCA) was performed with the degree of coronary stenosis. FFR and QFR were detected during the operation. Use FFR as a reference standard to verify the diagnostic performance of CT-QFR and QFR. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis with FFR as the reference standard. Major secondary endpoint is the non-inferiority of CT-QFR compared with QFR in the patients without extensively calcified lesions. The completion of the project will provide patients with a practical non-invasive assessment method of coronary heart disease which provides the best treatment strategy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 216
- Coronary CT angiography indicates that >= 1 stenosis with percent diameter stenosis between 30%-90% in a vessel >= 2mm.
- The invasive coronary angiography should be less than 30 days after the coronary CT angiography.
- The target lesion has received coronary stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft.
- Target lesion involves myocardial bridge.
- Severe heart failure (NYHA ≥III).
- Renal function is seriously damaged (eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73m2).
- Those who are contraindicated to use contrast agents, beta blockers, nitrates or adenosine drugs.
- Acute myocardial infarction within 1 month.
- The image quality of CTA or coronary angiography cannot be assessed.
- Any factors that affect the image quality of coronary CTA and coronary angiography, such as frequent premature contractions, atrial fibrillation, etc.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnostic performance of CT-QFR 1.5 year Diagnostic accuracy of on-site CT-QFR in identifying physiologically significant coronary artery stenosis, using FFR as the reference standard.
Presence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis : FFR \<= 0.80.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Correlation between CT-QFR and FFR 1.5 year Pearson correlation or spearman's correlation will be used to quantify the correlations between CT-QFR and FFR. Agreements between CT-QFR and FFR will be assessed by Bland-Altman plot.
The correlation coefficient r=0-0.2 represents very weak or no correlation. 0.2-0.4 represents weak correlation. 0.4-0.6 represents moderate correlation. 0.6-0.8 represents strong correlation. 0.8-1.0 represents very strong correlation.Other common measures of diagnostic performance of CT-QFR 1.5 year Other common measures of diagnostic performance of CT-QFR, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) at the patient level compared with FFR as the reference standard.
Presence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis : FFR \<= 0.80.Comparision between CT-QFR and QFR 1.5 year Use FFR as a reference standard to validate the non-inferiority of CT-QFR compared with QFR in the vessels without extensively calcified lesions defined by the combination of a cross-sectional calcium arc \>90° and a thickness \>1.5 mm. For CT-QFR, QFR and FFR evaluations, vessels with \<=0.80 are regarded as having hemodynamically significant CAD.
The comparison between CT-QFR, CCTA-derived percent diameter stenosis (CTA-DS%) and QCA-derived DS% 1.5 year The comparison of the discrimination ability between CT-QFR, CCTA-derived percent diameter stenosis (CTA-DS%), and QCA-derived DS% for identifying physiologically significant stenosis with FFR as the reference standard.
Presence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis : FFR \<= 0.80.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Xinkai Qu
🇨🇳Shanghai, Shanghai, China