跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04410627
NCT04410627撤回不适用

Pilot Trial Evaluating Usability, Acceptability, and Feasibility of the HoPE (Hospice Preparation and Education) Web-Based Tool

Duke University4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2022年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
发起方
试验地点
4
主要终点
Technology usability as measured by System Usability Scale

研究概览

简要总结

The investigator will conduct a two-site, randomized, controlled study of the HoPE (Hospice Preparation and Education) web-based tool versus usual care to assess: Technology usability (primary), study feasibility (secondary), user acceptability (secondary), and hospice service conversion rate (exploratory). Technology usability will be assessed through a one-time quantitative survey using established instruments. Study feasibility and user accessibility will be assessed through trial enrollment and retention alongside analytics assessing tool usage (e.g. time spent on each page of the website). Conversion rate is the percent of patients introduced to hospice who eventually enroll. The investigators will evaluate in an exploratory manner the differential effect of HoPE versus usual care.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 89 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Eligible for and referral made for home hospice services (Note: this excludes home palliative care, home infusion, home nursing, home physical therapy, and bridge services)
  • Aged between 21 and 89
  • Capacity to give consent
  • Ability to speak and understand English

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Technology usability as measured by System Usability Scale

时间窗: At study completion, up to 4 months.

To determine usability, the System Usability Scale will be administered to each participant in the intervention arm. As described by usability.gov: "The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. Based on research, a SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average, however the best way to interpret your results involves "normalizing" the scores to produce a percentile ranking."

次要结局

  • Study Feasibility as measured by enrollment efficiency(At study completion, up to 4 months)
  • User Accessibility as measured by Net Promoter score(At study completion, up to 4 months)
  • Study Feasibility as measured by intervention completion(At study completion, up to 4 months)

研究者

发起方
Duke University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验