Parenting for Lifelong Health-Philippines: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Culturally-adapted Parenting Program on Reducing the Risk of Violence Against Children in Low-income Filipino Families With Children Aged 2 to 6 Years in Manila
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Child Maltreatment
- Sponsor
- Ateneo de Manila University
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in frequency of child maltreatment
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) Philippines Evaluation Study: Multisite randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of a culturally-adapted parenting programme, Masayang Pamilya, versus services as usual in the reduction of child maltreatment and improvement of child wellbeing in low-income Filipino families with children aged two to six years in Metro Manila (N = 120).
A previous study focused on adaptation and feasibility testing was conducted from January 2016 to February 2017. Community-based participatory approaches were used to culturally adapt the Sinovuyo programme to a Filipino context. A formative evaluation using qualitative in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with parents, as well as consultative workshops with service providers and other stakeholders, examined issues regarding the needs and concerns of Filipino parents, appropriateness of intervention components and delivery, and other specific cultural issues in order to balance "fidelity" to evidence-based practices with "fit" to the local context [11]. The Sinovuyo programme was then adapted into the MaPa programme with local materials and approaches developed to fit the Philippine cultural context based on findings from the formative evaluation.
Detailed Description
Over the past decade there have been increasing calls for the scale-up of evidence-based interventions in order to reduce the risk of violence against children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) \[1\]. In particular, parenting programmes for families with young children have been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of child maltreatment and improving child wellbeing with promising evidence emerging from low- and middle-income countries \[2-4\]. These group-based programmes typically aim to strengthen caregiver-child relationships through positive parenting and to help parents to manage child behaviour problems through effective, age-appropriate, nonviolent discipline strategies. Despite the emerging evidence of the effectiveness of parenting interventions in reducing violence against children, many local governments and service providers in LMICs face multiple challenges implementing evidence-based parenting programs in resource poor contexts \[5\]. Parenting programmes are often too expensive to deliver effectively at scale in low-resource settings due to their complexity, intensity, and length \[3\]. Parenting programmes developed and evaluated in other contexts also may not fit the local service delivery context and may require adaptation to be relevant to the local culture of families. Additional programme content may also be necessary to address stress related to economic deprivation, high community violence, and parental distress. The process of delivery may also need to be simplified to improve participant engagement and the quality of delivery. As a result, it is essential that programmes implemented in LMICs are 1) effective at reducing violence against children, 2) integrated within the existing service delivery system, 3) feasible and culturally acceptable to service providers and families, and 4) scalable in terms of their affordability, replicability, and sustainability while reaching a maximum number of beneficiaries. However, there are currently very few parenting programmes that meet these criteria in LMICs, such as the Philippines, where the need is the greatest \[3\]. The PLH Philippines Evaluation Study aims to fill this gap by examining the efficacy of a locally-adapted, evidence-based parenting programme, the Masayang Pamilya Para Sa Batang Pilipino Parenting Programme (MaPa), for families with children ages two to six years living in Metro Manila who are enrolled in the Philippine Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) conditional cash transfer system. Our overall objective is to use a randomised controlled trial design to test the efficacy of the MaPa programme in reducing the risk of child maltreatment while improving child socio-emotional development, child behaviour, and parental mental health in comparison to treatment as usual controls in Metro Manila. Our primary objective is to examine the impact of the MaPa programme on the primary outcome of child maltreatment in comparison to treatment-as-usual controls at immediate post-intervention and at 1-year follow-up. Our secondary objective is to examine the impact of the MaPa programme on proximal outcomes associated with increased risks of child maltreatment, namely, positive parenting, intrusive parenting, and harsh parenting in comparison to treatment-as-usual controls at immediate post-intervention and at 1-year follow-up. Another secondary objective is to examine the impact of the MaPa programme at immediate post-intervention and at 1-year follow-up on child behaviour problems, child development outcomes (i.e., communication skills and socio-emotional development), parenting efficacy, parental wellbeing, parenting stress, parental depression, marital satisfaction, and intimate partner violence, in comparison to treatment as usual controls. Our tertiary objective is to examine the implementation of the MaPa programme when delivered within the DSWD conditional cash transfer system in terms of programme adherence by parents (i.e., recruitment, enrolment, attendance, engagement, dropout, and completion) and delivery by service providers (i.e., competency and fidelity). Our final objective is to examine predictors of programme adherence and associations between programme adherence and primary and secondary outcomes at immediate post-test and at 1-year follow-up.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 18 or older;
- •Primary caregiver responsible for the care of a child between the ages of two and six who is staying in the same household at least four nights a week in the previous month;
- •Spend at least four nights a week in the same household as the child;
- •Unemployed parent;
- •Recipient of the 4Ps conditional cash transfer programme;
- •Agreement to participate in the MaPa programme if allocated to the treatment condition;
- •Provision of consent to participate in the full study.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Any adult who has already participated in the Parent Effectiveness Service;
- •Any adult exhibiting severe mental health problems or acute mental disabilities;
- •Any adult that has been referred to child protection services due to child abuse.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in frequency of child maltreatment
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months
Child maltreatment will be measured using parent report of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool-Intervention scale (19 items, ICAST-I), an adaptation of a multi-national and consensus-based survey instrument measuring parent-report the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect (ICAST-P). It was validated in 6 LMIC and 7 languages (α = 0.77-0.88) and measures four types of abuse: physical, emotional and sexual abuse, as well as neglect. Response code for the ICAST-I was adapted to a scale from 0 to more than 8 times to assess the frequency of a certain behaviour in the past month. This study will assess incidence of child maltreatment by creating dichotomous variables for physical abuse, verbal abuse, and neglect, as well as an overall indication of previous child abuse (0 = no abuse; 1 = previous abuse). We will also assess frequency of overall abuse by summing all of the subscales as well as for each individual subscale.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in levels of endorsement of physical punishment(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of parent dependency on alcohol(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in number of daily child behavior problems and parenting behaviors(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in number of child behavior problems(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of parent efficacy(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of parental depression(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of child development - communication skills(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in frequency of positive parenting(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in frequency of dysfunctional parenting(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of child socio-emotional development(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of marital satisfaction(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of parenting stress(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of parental wellbeing(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in frequency of intimate partner violence(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)
- Change in levels of parent/child sleep(Change from baseline at 7 months and at 19 months)