MedPath

Comparison of USG-guided and blind techniques for radial artery cannulation by residents in a teaching institute.

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: C716- Malignant neoplasm of cerebellum
Registration Number
CTRI/2021/02/031051
Lead Sponsor
Afroz Shahana M Khan
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

a. Adult patients undergoing high risk surgeries where invasive BP monitoring is needed.

b. Patients willing to give consent

c. Trained postgraduate 3rd year (PGY-3) anesthesiology residents (at least 5 TBP and 5 USG radial arterial catheterizations prior to the study).

Exclusion Criteria

a. American Society of Anaesthesiologist class V.

b. Patients not willing to give consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To study the number of patients whose arterial catheter successfully inserted at the first attemptTimepoint: At the end of the study i.e 2 months.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. The study the number of attempts needed for successful arterial catheter placement in both the methods. <br/ ><br>2. To assess the time required for successful cannulation. <br/ ><br>3. To evaluate number of sites used for successful cannulation. <br/ ><br>4. To figure out total catheters being used for cannulation. <br/ ><br>5. To determine rate of complications and total number of operators required in both the methods. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: At the end of the study i.e 2 months.
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath