Postoperative Periprosthetic Fractures in Hip Fracture Patients: Exeter vs Anatomic SP2 Lubinus Stem
- Conditions
- Periprosthetic FracturesFemoral Neck Fractures
- Interventions
- Procedure: Lubinus SP2 stemProcedure: Exeter stem
- Registration Number
- NCT03326271
- Lead Sponsor
- Sundsvall Hospital
- Brief Summary
Recent studies have indicated a high incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture in elderly patients treated with two commonly used cemented polished, tapered femoral stems. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and incidence rate of PPF in a cohort of elderly with femoral neck fractures (FNF) treated with either a collarless, polished, tapered stem (Exeter) or an anatomic matte stem (Lubinus SP 2).
Patients and Methods In a multicentre retrospective cohort study 2529 patients 60 years and above, with a FNF as indication for primary surgery with a cemented hip arthroplasty were included. Patients were treated either with a polished tapered Exeter stem or a matte anatomic Lubinus SP12 stem according to the surgeons preference or to the praxis of the present department.
The incidence of perprosthetic femoral fractures Hip-related complications and repeat surgery were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2527
- Femoral neck fracture
- Treated with hip arthroplasty with Exeter or SP2 stem
- Patological fracture
- Other typ of stem
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lubinus SP2 stem Lubinus SP2 stem Patients treated with a cemented Lubinus SP2 stem for a femoral neck fracture. Both total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty are included. Exeter stem Exeter stem Patients treated with a cemented Exeter stem for a femoral neck fracture. Both total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty are included.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Periprosthetic femoral fractures 2006-2014 The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are compared between the two groups studied (patients treated with Exeter stem or Lubinus SP2 stem. The hypothesis that the type of stem affects the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures are studied. The comparison will be analysed using cox proportional hazards or poisson regression analysis.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Riskfactors for periprosthetic fractures 2006-2014 Sex (male or female), age (years), ASA class (1-2 or 3-4), Exeter stem size (0-2, 3-4, 5-6) and surgical approach (direct lateral or posterolateral) type of stem used (Lubinus Sp2 or Exeter stem)