Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction due to perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
- Conditions
- bile duct cancerCholangiocarcinoma10019815
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON52313
- Lead Sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 73
- 18 years or older.
- Capable of providing written and oral informed consent.
- Histological or cytological proof of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
(adenocarcinoma).
- Perihilar biliary obstruction with indication for drainage with uSEMS.*
- Advanced (no candidate for surgical resection) due to metastases, vascular or
lymph node (N2). involvement on imaging or during staging laparoscopy according
to multidisciplinary team (MDT).
*Only patients with pCCA are eligible however in case of reasonable doubt
between intrahepatic CCA with a perihilar biliary obstruction or massforming
pCCA, patients can be included.
- Patients who potentially qualify for curative resection of pCCA.
- pCCA eligible for liver transplantation.
- Life-expectancy less than 3 months.
- ERCP and PTC technically not feasible.
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy (PTT >1,5x prolonged or thrombocytes below
40*10E9/L).
- Ongoing cholangitis or liver abscess. Patients are required to be off
antibiotic treatment for cholangitis and/or liver abscess at least 7 days.
- Any condition that is unstable or that could jeopardize the safety of the
subject and their compliance in the study.
- Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The primary endpoint is the time to biliary obstruction.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Secondary endpoints include technical and functional success, the effect on<br /><br>quality of life, overall survival, adverse events, number of re-interventions,<br /><br>time to re-interventions, need for external drains, and evaluation of the<br /><br>effect of repeated eRFA on stent patency. </p><br>