Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01193998
NCT01193998CompletedNot Applicable

Analysis of the Impact of Using a Validated Diagnostic Prediction Model of Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department

Unity Health Toronto3 sites in 3 countries186 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2010Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
186
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Comparison of diagnostic model versus clinical judgment in appropriate diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure in dyspneic emergency department patients

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a validated diagnostic prediction model in the appropriate diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure (AHF) in patients presenting at the emergency department with undifferentiated dyspnea.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age ≥ 18 years
  • •Presentation to the ED with undifferentiated shortness of breath

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Dyspnea of obvious cause, e.g. chest trauma, obvious clinical exacerbation of known chronic obstructive disease
  • •Obvious pulmonary edema in a patient with a known diagnosis of HF and recently admitted to hospital for HF
  • •Clinician does not plan to treat for AHF at all, but rather to pursue other causes of dyspnea (i.e., probability of AHF ≤ 20%)
  • •Clinician plans to treat for AHF and not to pursue other causes of dyspnea (i.e., probability of AHF ≥ 80%)
  • •Acute coronary syndrome within one month
  • •Chronic renal failure (serum creatinine ≥ 250 mol/l)
  • •Anticipated life expectancy < 6 months due to non-cardiovascular causes
  • •Participation in another interventional outcome trial
  • •Inability to obtain informed consent, including inability of patient to understand English

Arms & Interventions

Clinician exposed to Model result

Active Comparator

Intervention: Treatment as per model probability (Other)

Clinician blinded to Model result

Experimental

Intervention: Treatment as per usual care (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison of diagnostic model versus clinical judgment in appropriate diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure in dyspneic emergency department patients

Time Frame: 60 days after patient presentation to the emergency department

Secondary Outcomes

  • Determine if use of the diagnostic prediction model leads to cost savings and better health outcomes(From randomization until 60 days after patient presentation to the emergency department)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Brian Steinhart

Physician

Unity Health Toronto

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials