Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06505798
NCT06505798
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Cryoballoon/Radiofrequency/Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Versus Medical Treatment for Heart

University College, London14 sites in 1 country1,200 target enrollmentNovember 21, 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Sponsor
University College, London
Enrollment
1200
Locations
14
Primary Endpoint
Time to first all-cause death and urgent CV hospitalisation
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
5 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that causes an irregular heart beat and is a cause of heart failure (HF). Treatments include drugs to slow the heart rate, anti-arrhythmic drugs or ablation of the heart to help preserve normal rhythm. A number of trials have suggested that ablation may be superior to drug treatment to reduce hospitalisations or prevent early death. However, these studies have been small and the results not applicable to the general population with AF and heart failure in the UK. This international study will compare catheter ablation and optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone to see if catheter ablation reduces unplanned heart failure hospitalisations and death rates and improves quality of life.

Detailed Description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the severity of, and death from, heart failure (HF). Several small studies have demonstrated that restoration of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation in patients with HF improves left ventricular (LV) function and exercise tolerance. What is unknown is whether or not AF ablation reduces all-cause death and urgent CV hospitalisations in populations with HF. The current trial will answer this outstanding question, which is faced by HF clinicians and electrophysiologists on a daily basis. AF ablation can be performed very effectively and efficiently using a cryo-balloon or radio-frequency ablation PVI technique. These techniques have evolved slowly and are unlikely to change substantially over the course of this trial. One small trial (n=363) in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT defibrillator recipients (CASTLE-AF) reported a death benefit of AF ablation but the patients were highly selected and the death reduction was far higher than real world expected differences. Recent studies have noted that the population randomised in CASTLE-AF was not representative of the general HF population with only 7% of patients in the "real world" setting meeting the trial entry criteria. CASTLE-AF is therefore provocative but inconclusive; it has made little change to clinical practice. As no studies have investigated the death benefit in a general HF population, the proposed trial is necessary and warranted. This study is designed as a randomised, open label multicentre clinical trial in which catheter ablation and medical therapy is compared to medical therapy alone in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (\<50%) and paroxysmal or persistent AF to determine if this reduces all-cause death and urgent CV hospitalisations as well as improving QoL. By utilising the clinical and research networks of the British Heart Failure Society and British Heart Rhythm Society (BHRS) we will recruit 1200 patients. The current trial will be almost three times the size of the only previous inconclusive trial which was reported in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 21, 2024
End Date
December 15, 2031
Last Updated
5 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to first all-cause death and urgent CV hospitalisation

Time Frame: 2 years minimum (range: 2-5.5 years)

The primary outcome (time to first all-cause death and urgent CV hospitalisation) will be summarised by randomised group and analysed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model for time to first event, adjusting for factors used to balance the randomisation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Total (first and recurrent) all-cause death and urgent cardiovascular hospitalisations.(2 years minimum (range: 2-5.5 years))
  • Cardiovascular death(2 years minimum (range: 2-5.5 years))
  • QoL at 6 and 12 months assessed using the KCCQ-CSS.(12 months)
  • Time to all-cause death(2 years minimum (range: 2-5.5 years))
  • Total (first and recurrent) all-cause death and urgent HF hospitalisations(2 years minimum (range: 2-5.5 years))

Study Sites (14)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials