COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF HARD AND SOFT TISSUE CHANGES AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION IN CONTRAST WITH CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMY TECHNIQUE: AN IN VIVO STUDY
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Recruiting
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- A crestal incision will be given and flap will be raised in the desired region under local anesthesia Implants will be placed using conventional osteotomy and osseodensification technique
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Many techniques have been developed to increase primarystability of implants osseodensification is a new osteotomy technique forenhancing bone density around implants and increasing primary stability Hencethe objective of the current in vivo study is to evaluate hard and soft tissuechanges around dental implants placed with osseodensification in contrast withconventional osteotomy technique
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Stratified randomization
- Masking
- Not Applicable
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 25.00 Year(s) to 50.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Partially edentulous sites both maxillary and mandibular arches Ability and willingness of the patients to follow the study protocol Adequate bone width and height at the site of implant placement No signs of TMJ disorders.
Exclusion Criteria
- •General contraindications to implant surgery Uncontrolled diabetes Bruxism Temporomandibular disorder Heavy smokers Chronic bone disease Psychiatric disorders Unrealistic expectations of the patient Inability to adhere to planned follow up Incapacity to give informed consent Participation in other clinical trial interfering with present protocol.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
A crestal incision will be given and flap will be raised in the desired region under local anesthesia Implants will be placed using conventional osteotomy and osseodensification technique
Time Frame: Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices
Early loading will be done for all implants with temporary prosthesis and will be restored with definitive prosthesis
Time Frame: Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices
Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices
Time Frame: Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices
Secondary Outcomes
- Early loading will be done for all implants with temporary prosthesis and will be restored with definitive prosthesis(Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices)