MedPath

comparison between conventional osteotomy and osseodensification technique

Recruiting
Conditions
Partial loss of teeth,
Registration Number
CTRI/2021/04/033123
Lead Sponsor
Institute of Dental Studies and Technologies
Brief Summary

Many techniques have been developed to increase primarystability of implants osseodensification is a new osteotomy technique forenhancing bone density around implants and increasing primary stability Hencethe objective of the current in vivo study is to evaluate hard and soft tissuechanges around dental implants placed with osseodensification in contrast withconventional osteotomy technique

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Open to Recruitment
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria

Partially edentulous sites both maxillary and mandibular arches Ability and willingness of the patients to follow the study protocol Adequate bone width and height at the site of implant placement No signs of TMJ disorders.

Exclusion Criteria

General contraindications to implant surgery Uncontrolled diabetes Bruxism Temporomandibular disorder Heavy smokers Chronic bone disease Psychiatric disorders Unrealistic expectations of the patient Inability to adhere to planned follow up Incapacity to give informed consent Participation in other clinical trial interfering with present protocol.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
A crestal incision will be given and flap will be raised in the desired region under local anesthesia Implants will be placed using conventional osteotomy and osseodensification techniqueStandardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices
Early loading will be done for all implants with temporary prosthesis and will be restored with definitive prosthesisStandardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices
Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indicesStandardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Early loading will be done for all implants with temporary prosthesis and will be restored with definitive prosthesisStandardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Institute of Dental Studies and Technologies

🇮🇳

Ghaziabad, UTTAR PRADESH, India

Institute of Dental Studies and Technologies
🇮🇳Ghaziabad, UTTAR PRADESH, India
abin mathew abraham
Principal investigator
7795656715
abinabraham777@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.