Infracoccygeal Botox for Dyssynergia

Completed

Conditions: Dyssynergic Defaecation
Evacuation Disorder
Anismus
Defecation Disorder

Interventions: Procedure: Percutaneous infracoccygeal Botulinum toxin injection to puborectalis

Registration Number: NCT04879524

Lead Sponsor: Queen Mary University of London

Brief Summary: Background:

Constipation is a common problem, affecting up to 20% of the population during their lifetime. Some patients respond poorly to standard treatments such as laxatives. A subgroup of these have dyssynergic defaecation where the muscles that control bowel movements fail to relax during pushing, preventing evacuation of stools. Currently, the mainstay of treatment requires muscle retraining by a therapist using a technique called biofeedback. Patients in whom biofeedback has failed are left with few options, one of which includes Botox injection into the pelvic floor muscles involved in the defaecation process. However, current method of injection is inaccurate and often requires anaesthesia. The investigators propose a novel technique for Botox delivery which reduces the risks and associated costs.

Objectives:

1. The primary objective is to demonstrate technical feasibility of percutaneous infracoccygeal Botox injection as an alternative to transanal puborectalis muscle injection for the treatment of dyssynergic defaecation.

2. The secondary objectives are to assess the safety and acceptability of this technique, and to derive pilot clinical effectiveness data to inform future studies.

Methods:

The investigators will carry out Botox injection into the puborectalis muscle under ultrasound guidance in the outpatient department. This will be done by percutaneous injection below the coccyx where the puborectalis has been demonstrated to be easily accessible. An electromyography of the puborectalis is obtained before the injection to demonstrate proof of mechanism. The investigators will collect data using a combination of questionnaires, patient baseline data, and anorectal physiology test results before and after the treatment.

Outcomes:

* Feasibility: procedure duration, rate of identification of puborectalis by ultrasound scan and pre-injection EMG, procedure limitations, and successful injection rate

* Safety: rate of adverse events

* Acceptability: patient pain and comfort, willingness to undergo repeat procedure

* Preliminary data on effectiveness: Cleveland Clinic constipation score, anorectal physiology test results

Detailed Description: Patients with dyssynergic defaecation represent a subgroup of a larger group of patients presenting with symptoms of chronic constipation. The disorder is characterised by impaired stool expulsion as a result of inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor musculation despite normal propulsive force during attempted defaecation. Failure of the puborectalis and/or anal sphincter muscles to relax during evacuation leads to a closed anal canal which prevents the emptying of stools.

A Cochrane review in 2014 on the treatment of chronic constipation in adults demonstrated a high prevalence of dyssynergic defaecation and a variety of treatments. In this group, biofeedback was found to be superior to oral diazepam, sham treatment, and laxatives; while surgical procedures such as partial division of the puborectalis muscle were more efficacious, the risks of adverse reaction, namely incontinence, were high. Thus, biofeedback therapy is the current gold-standard for the treatment of dyssynergia. The success rate of biofeedback in correcting or improving the symptoms in patients with dyssynergia varies between 33% and 80%. Difficulty arises in those in whom biofeedback is unsuccessful, as there is little, and conflicting, low quality evidence on alternative therapies.

One further therapeutic option uses injection of Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) into the puborectalis and/or external anal sphincter muscles. This is currently the second-line treatment for dyssynergic defaecation in whom biofeedback has failed. A systematic review in 2016 on the use of BTXA in patients with 'anismus', a term previously used to describe dyssynergic defaecation, demonstrated initial clinical improvement in symptoms in 77.4% of patients. Two of the seven studies were conducted on participants in whom biofeedback therapy had failed. Complications were reported in 7.4% of patients (0 to 22.6%) and included faecal incontinence, which was minor and transient, posterior anal fissure, and rectal prolapse. The effect of BTXA was not permanent, with clinical improvement declining to 46% at four months after the injection. For this reason, several studies offered repeated treatments.

The delivery of BTXA injection varied between studies and institutions in terms of dosage and position of injection, but all were performed via perianal or transanal approaches, often requiring sedation or anaesthesia. There are several disadvantages of this approach including cost (operating theatre utilisation) and risks associated with anaesthesia and infection from passing the needle through a contaminated operative field. In addition, the injection site is defined blind by the surgeon's finger (an issue of accuracy of injection and hazard of needle stick injury).

The proposed study aims to demonstrate the technical feasibility of an alternative approach to delivering BTXA injection in adult patients with dyssynergic defaecation. This novel technique injects BTXA into the puborectalis muscle percutaneously using an infracoccygeal approach under ultrasound guidance. This allows the procedure to be performed in an outpatient radiology setting without the need for any form of anaesthesia or analgesia. The injection is performed in a clean operative field away from the anus, minimising risk of infection and the muscle can be clearly visualised (see below). These advantages will be particularly valuable in patients who require repeated procedures or those with multiple co-morbidities at high anaesthetic risk.

The utilisation of BTXA in human is well established. This medication is licensed for use in focal spasticity with well-established side-effects and interactions. Current evidence for the use of BTXA in dyssynergic defaecation is based on the conventional transanal approach, with report on efficacy and complications as previously stated.

The puborectalis is easily accessible below the coccyx, and is the site for ultrasonic assessment in the paediatric population. The identification of puborectalis muscle in the infracoccygeal position has not been described in the literature in the adult population. However, pilot imaging studies on a small number of non-obese subjects have been successful in easily identifying the puborectalis using ultrasound scan. This approach has the potential to allow accurate administration of BTXA injection under ultrasonic guidance in the outpatient setting without the need for anaesthesia or operating theatre utilisation. The general aim of this study is to demonstrate that percutaneous infracoccygeal BTXA injection is a valid alternative approach to transanal injection for the treatment of dyssynergic defaecation. Specifically, the investigators will determine technical feasibility (including pilot proof of mechanism), patient acceptability, safety, and pilot efficacy outcomes for a future definitive trial.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 8

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients aged between 18 and 80 years
Diagnosis of dyssynergic defaecation using Rome IV criteria
Ability to understand written and spoken English
Ability and willingness to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

Paediatric patients (age under 18 years)
Diagnosis of defined structural or metabolic diseases that could cause constipation, such as Hirschsprung's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, hypothyroidism (untreated), diabetic neuropathy, muscular dystrophy, motor neurone diseases, spinal injury leading to paraplegia, cauda equina syndrome
Psychiatric or physical inability to comply with the study protocol (including e-diary assessments) at investigator discretion.
Contra-indications to BTXA such as allergies, pregnancy (or intention to become pregnant during study period), breastfeeding, generalised disorders of muscle activity, myasthenia gravis
Contra-indications to infracoccygeal injection at injection site such as infection or pressure sore, spina bifida, pilonidal disease, bleeding disorders (including therapeutic anticoagulation)
Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40)
Defunctioning loop or end stoma in situ
External rectal prolapse

Study & Design

Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL

Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Percutaneous infracoccygeal Botulinum toxin injection to puborectalis	Percutaneous infracoccygeal Botulinum toxin injection to puborectalis	100 units of Botulinum toxin type A (Botox, Allergan, Ireland) injection into the puborectalis muscle to each side of the midline, achieving a total of 200 units

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The Rate of Identification of Puborectalis During Ultrasound Scan	Visit 3: week 18	The investigator will record the number of times the puborectalis muscle is successfully identified using ultrasound scan (muscle seen to contract on volition) and pre-injection EMG (change in EMG waveform on volitional contraction) by the radiologist and neurologist, respectively, at the beginning of the injection procedure.
Procedure Duration	Visit 3: week 18	The investigator will record the time (in minutes) taken to for the radiologist to complete the injection procedure
Procedure Limitations	Visit 3: week 18	The investigator will record any procedure or patient related factors which prevented a successful injection, e.g. body habitus or equipment failure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Rate of Adverse Events	From visit 3 to visit 6: week 18 to 42	Any adverse events reported by the patients or their clinician following the injection
Patient's Level Pain and Comfort Assessed at Post-procedure	Visit 3: week 18	Following the procedure, the patient will complete a post-procedure questionnaire. * The patient is asked to give their response to the statement "the procedure was painful" on a 5-point rating scale (strongly agree/ agree/ neutral/ disagree/ strongly disagree). * The patient is asked to give their response to the statement "the procedure was comfortable" on a 5-point rating scale (strongly agree/ agree/ neutral/ disagree/ strongly disagree).
The Number of Patient Indicating Yes, They Would be Willing to Undergo a Repeat Procedure	Visit 3: week 18	The number of patients who answered Yes when asked if they will be willing to undergo a repeat procedure (yes/no) in a post-procedure questionnaire.